Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jun;86(6):1018-25. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0671.
To evaluate the performance of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) typing versus the current standard for the typing of Shigella pulsed gel electrophoresis (PFGE), we typed 116 Shigella isolates from a village in an endemic setting over a 20-month period using both methods. PFGE identified 37 pulse types and had a discrimination index of 0.925 (95% confidence interval = 0.830-1.00), whereas ERIC-PCR identified 42 types and had a discrimination index of 0.961 (95% confidence interval = 0.886-1.00). PFGE and ERIC-PCR showed a 90.4% correlation in the designation of isolates as clonal or non-clonal in pairwise comparisons. Both systems were highly reproducible and provided highly similar and supplementary data compared with serotyping regarding the transmission dynamics of shigellosis in this community. ERIC-PCR is considerably more rapid and inexpensive than PFGE and may have a complementary role to PFGE for initial investigations of hypothesized outbreaks in resource-limited settings.
为了评估肠杆菌基因间重复序列聚合酶链反应(ERIC-PCR)分型与现行志贺氏菌脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)分型标准的性能,我们在 20 个月的时间里,使用这两种方法对来自一个流行地区村庄的 116 株志贺氏菌进行了分型。PFGE 鉴定出 37 种脉冲类型,分辨指数为 0.925(95%置信区间=0.830-1.00),而 ERIC-PCR 鉴定出 42 种类型,分辨指数为 0.961(95%置信区间=0.886-1.00)。在成对比较中,PFGE 和 ERIC-PCR 对分离株是否为克隆或非克隆的指定具有 90.4%的相关性。两种系统均具有高度的重现性,与血清分型相比,在该社区的志贺氏菌病传播动态方面提供了高度相似和补充的数据。与 PFGE 相比,ERIC-PCR 速度更快,成本更低,在资源有限的环境中,对于假设暴发的初步调查,可能具有与 PFGE 互补的作用。