Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Oct;39(10):754-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02327.x. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
The aim of this research was to test the hypothesis that treatment with intra-oral appliances with different occlusal designs was beneficial in the management of pain of masticatory muscles compared with a control group. A total of 51 patients were analysed according to the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) to obtain the diagnosis of masticatory myofascial pain (MMP). The sample was then randomly divided into three groups: group I (n = 21) wore a full coverage acrylic stabilisation occlusal splint; group II (n = 16) wore an anterior device nociceptive trigeminal inhibitory (NTI) system; and group III (n = 14) only received counselling for behavioural changes and self-care (the control group). The first two groups also received counselling. Follow-ups were performed after 2 and 6 weeks and 3 months. In these sessions, patients were evaluated by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the masticatory muscles. Possible adverse effects were also recorded, such as discomfort while using the appliance and occlusal changes. The results were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis, anova, Tukey's and Friedman tests, with a significance level of 5%. Group I showed improvement in the reported pain at the first follow-up (2 weeks), whereas for groups II and III, this progress was detected only after 6 weeks and 3 months, respectively. The PPT values did not change significantly. It was concluded that behavioural changes are effective in the management of pain in MMP patients. However, the simultaneous use of occlusal devices appears to produce an earlier improvement.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即与对照组相比,使用具有不同咬合设计的口腔内矫治器治疗咀嚼肌疼痛是有益的。根据颞下颌关节紊乱的研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD),对 51 名患者进行了分析,以获得咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛(MMP)的诊断。然后,将样本随机分为三组:I 组(n=21)佩戴全口丙烯酸稳定咬合夹板;II 组(n=16)佩戴前牙设备疼痛三叉神经抑制(NTI)系统;III 组(n=14)仅接受行为改变和自我保健的咨询(对照组)。前两组也接受了咨询。在 2、6 周和 3 个月时进行随访。在这些会议中,患者通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和咀嚼肌压痛阈值(PPT)进行评估。还记录了可能的不良反应,如使用器具时的不适和咬合变化。采用 Kruskal-Wallis、anova、Tukey 和 Friedman 检验对结果进行分析,置信水平为 5%。I 组在第一次随访(2 周)时报告的疼痛有所改善,而 II 组和 III 组仅在 6 周和 3 个月后才出现这种进展。PPT 值没有明显变化。结论是行为改变对 MMP 患者疼痛的管理有效。然而,同时使用咬合装置似乎会产生更早的改善。