Conti Paulo César Rodrigues, Corrêa Ana Silvia da Mota, Lauris José Roberto Pereira, Stuginski-Barbosa Juliana
Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Department of Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Community Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Oct;23(5):529-35. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140438. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
The benefit of the use of some intraoral devices in arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients is still unknown. This study assessed the effectiveness of the partial use of intraoral devices and counseling in the management of patients with disc displacement with reduction (DDWR) and arthralgia.
A total of 60 DDWR and arthralgia patients were randomly divided into three groups: group I (n=20) wore anterior repositioning occlusal splints (ARS); group II (n=20) wore the Nociceptive Trigeminal Inhibition Clenching Suppression System devices (NTI-tss); and group III (n=20) only received counseling for behavioral changes and self-care (the control group). The first two groups also received counseling. Follow-ups were performed after 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. In these sessions, patients were evaluated by means of a visual analogue scale, pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), maximum range of motion and TMJ sounds. Possible adverse effects were also recorded, such as discomfort while using the device and occlusal changes. The results were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's and Fisher Exact Test, with a significance level of 5%.
Groups I and II showed improvement in pain intensity at the first follow-up. This progress was recorded only after 3 months in Group III. Group II showed an increased in joint sounds frequency. The PPT values, mandibular range of motion and the number of occlusal contacts did not change significantly.
The simultaneous use of intraoral devices (partial time) plus behavioral modifications seems to produce a more rapid pain improvement in patients with painful DDWR. The use of NTI-tss could increase TMJ sounds. Although intraoral devices with additional counseling should be considered for the management of painful DDWR, dentists should be aware of the possible side effects of the intraoral device's design.
在关节源性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者中使用某些口腔内装置的益处仍不明确。本研究评估了部分使用口腔内装置及咨询指导在治疗可复性盘移位(DDWR)和关节痛患者中的有效性。
总共60例DDWR和关节痛患者被随机分为三组:第一组(n = 20)佩戴前伸咬合夹板(ARS);第二组(n = 20)佩戴伤害性三叉神经抑制紧咬抑制系统装置(NTI-tss);第三组(n = 20)仅接受行为改变和自我护理方面的咨询指导(对照组)。前两组也接受了咨询指导。在2周、6周和3个月后进行随访。在这些随访中,通过视觉模拟量表、颞下颌关节(TMJ)的压痛阈值(PPT)、最大活动范围和TMJ弹响对患者进行评估。还记录了可能的不良反应,如使用装置时的不适和咬合变化。采用方差分析、Tukey检验和Fisher精确检验对结果进行分析,显著性水平为5%。
第一组和第二组在首次随访时疼痛强度有所改善。第三组在3个月后才出现这种进展。第二组关节弹响频率增加。PPT值、下颌活动范围和咬合接触次数没有显著变化。
同时使用口腔内装置(部分时间)加行为改变似乎能使疼痛性DDWR患者的疼痛更快得到改善。使用NTI-tss可能会增加TMJ弹响。虽然在治疗疼痛性DDWR时应考虑使用口腔内装置并辅以咨询指导,但牙医应意识到口腔内装置设计可能产生的副作用。