Neurology Department, Faculty of Neurology Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30(4):333-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0764.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of trigger points' management by Positional Release Therapy (PRT) and routine medical therapy in treatment of Tension Type Headache.
Tension Type Headache is the most frequent headache with the basis of myofascial and trigger point disorders. PRT is an indirect technique that treats trigger points.
30 Patients with active trigger points in cervical muscles entered to the study. They were randomly assigned to PRT or medical therapy group. Headache frequency, intensity and duration and tablet count were recorded by use of a daily headache diary. Sensitivity of trigger points was assessed by numeric pain intensity and by use of a digital force gauge (FG 5020).
Both groups showed significant reduction in headache frequency and duration and tablet count after treatment phase. However, the reduction of study variables was persisted only in PRT group after follow up phase. There was no significant reduction in headache intensity, neither in PRT and nor in medication group. Sensitivity of trigger points was significantly reduced. In comparison of the two study groups, there was no significant difference in headache frequency, intensity, duration and tablet count (p> 0.05).
Both procedures were equally effective according to the study. Thus, PRT can be a treatment choice for patients with T.T.H.
本研究旨在比较触发点管理的效果通过位置释放疗法 (PRT) 和常规医学治疗紧张性头痛。
紧张性头痛是最常见的头痛,其基础是肌筋膜和触发点紊乱。PRT 是一种间接治疗触发点的技术。
30 名患有颈部肌肉活跃触发点的患者进入研究。他们被随机分配到 PRT 或医学治疗组。头痛频率、强度和持续时间以及片剂计数通过使用每日头痛日记记录。通过数字疼痛强度和数字力计 (FG 5020) 评估触发点的敏感性。
两组在治疗阶段后均显示头痛频率、持续时间和片剂计数显著减少。然而,在随访阶段,只有 PRT 组的研究变量减少持续存在。头痛强度没有明显降低,无论是在 PRT 组还是在药物组。触发点的敏感性显著降低。在两个研究组之间,头痛频率、强度、持续时间和片剂计数没有显著差异(p>0.05)。
根据研究结果,两种方法同样有效。因此,PRT 可以成为 T.T.H.患者的治疗选择。