• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发作性紧张型头痛中的肌筋膜触发点、颈部活动度和头前伸姿势

Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility, and forward head posture in episodic tension-type headache.

作者信息

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César, Cuadrado Maria L, Pareja Juan A

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Headache. 2007 May;47(5):662-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00632.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00632.x
PMID:17501847
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the differences in the presence of trigger points (TrPs) in head and neck muscles, forward head posture (FHP) and neck mobility between episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) subjects and healthy controls. In addition, we assess the relationship between these muscle TrPs, FHP, neck mobility, and several clinical variables concerning the intensity and the temporal profile of headache.

BACKGROUND

TTH is a headache in which musculoskeletal disorders of the craniocervical region might play an important role in its pathogenesis. Design.-A blinded, controlled pilot study.

METHODS

Fifteen ETTH subjects and 15 matched controls without headache were studied. TrPs in both upper trapezius, both sternocleidomastoids, and both temporalis muscles were identified according to Simons and Gerwin diagnostic criteria (tenderness in a hypersensible spot within a palpable taut band, local twitch response elicited by snapping palpation, and elicited referred pain with palpation). Side-view pictures of each subject were taken in both sitting and standing positions, in order to assess FHP by measuring the craniovertebral angle. A cervical goniometer was employed to measure neck mobility. All measures were taken by a blinded assessor. A headache diary was kept for 4 weeks in order to assess headache intensity, frequency, and duration.

RESULTS

The mean number of TrPs for each ETTH subject was 3.7 (SD: 1.3), of which 1.9 (SD: 0.9) were active, and 1.8 (SD: 0.9) were latent. Control subjects only had latent TrPs (mean: 1.5; SD: 1). TrP occurrence between the 2 groups was significantly different for active TrPs (P < .001), but not for latent TrPs (P > .05). Differences in the distribution of TrPs were significant for the right upper trapezius muscles (P= .04), the left sternocleidomastoid (P= .03), and both temporalis muscles (P < .001). Within the ETTH group, headache intensity, frequency, and duration outcomes did not differ depending on TrP activity, whether the TrP was active or latent. The craniovertebral angle was smaller, ie, there was a greater FHP, in ETTH patients than in healthy controls for both sitting and standing positions (P < .05). ETTH subjects with active TrPs in the analyzed muscles had a greater FHP than those with latent TrPs in both sitting and standing positions, though differences were only significant for certain muscles. Finally, ETTH patients also showed lesser neck mobility than healthy controls in the total range of motion as well as in half-cycles (except for cervical extension), although neck mobility did not seem to influence headache parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Active TrPs in the upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, and temporalis muscles were more common in ETTH subjects than in healthy controls, although TrP activity was not related to any clinical variable concerning the intensity and the temporal profile of headache. ETTH patients showed greater FHP and lesser neck mobility than healthy controls, although both disorders were not correlated with headache parameters.

摘要

目的

评估发作性紧张型头痛(ETTH)患者与健康对照者在头颈部肌肉触发点(TrP)的存在情况、头前伸姿势(FHP)和颈部活动度方面的差异。此外,我们评估这些肌肉TrP、FHP、颈部活动度与若干有关头痛强度和时间特征的临床变量之间的关系。

背景

紧张型头痛是一种颅颈区域肌肉骨骼疾病可能在其发病机制中起重要作用的头痛。设计:一项双盲、对照的前瞻性研究。

方法

对15例ETTH患者和15例无头痛的匹配对照者进行研究。根据西蒙斯和格温诊断标准(在可触及的紧张带内的高敏点压痛、弹拨触诊引发局部抽搐反应以及触诊引发牵涉痛)确定双侧斜方肌上部、双侧胸锁乳突肌和双侧颞肌中的TrP。为评估FHP,通过测量颅椎角,在坐位和站位分别拍摄每个受试者的侧视图照片。使用颈椎角度计测量颈部活动度。所有测量均由一名盲法评估者进行。记录头痛日记4周,以评估头痛强度、频率和持续时间。

结果

每名ETTH患者的TrP平均数量为3.7个(标准差:1.3),其中1.9个(标准差:0.9)为活动性TrP,1.8个(标准差:0.9)为潜伏性TrP。对照者仅存在潜伏性TrP(平均:1.5;标准差:1)。两组之间活动性TrP的TrP发生率差异有统计学意义(P <.001),但潜伏性TrP无差异(P >.05)。右侧斜方肌上部(P =.04)、左侧胸锁乳突肌(P =.03)和双侧颞肌(P <.001)的TrP分布差异有统计学意义。在ETTH组内,无论TrP是活动性还是潜伏性,头痛强度、频率和持续时间结果均不因TrP活动情况而异。对于坐位和站位,ETTH患者的颅椎角均小于健康对照者,即存在更大的FHP(P <.05)。在分析的肌肉中存在活动性TrP的ETTH患者在坐位和站位时的FHP均大于存在潜伏性TrP的患者,尽管差异仅在某些肌肉中具有统计学意义。最后,ETTH患者在总活动范围以及半周期(颈椎伸展除外)的颈部活动度也低于健康对照者,尽管颈部活动度似乎不影响头痛参数。

结论

ETTH患者斜方肌上部、胸锁乳突肌和颞肌中的活动性TrP比健康对照者更常见,尽管TrP活动与任何有关头痛强度和时间特征的临床变量均无关。ETTH患者比健康对照者表现出更大的FHP和更小的颈部活动度,尽管这两种异常均与头痛参数无关。

相似文献

1
Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility, and forward head posture in episodic tension-type headache.发作性紧张型头痛中的肌筋膜触发点、颈部活动度和头前伸姿势
Headache. 2007 May;47(5):662-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00632.x.
2
Myofascial trigger points and their relationship to headache clinical parameters in chronic tension-type headache.肌筋膜触发点及其与慢性紧张型头痛临床参数的关系
Headache. 2006 Sep;46(8):1264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00440.x.
3
Trigger points in the suboccipital muscles and forward head posture in tension-type headache.紧张型头痛患者枕下肌肉触发点与头前伸姿势
Headache. 2006 Mar;46(3):454-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00288.x.
4
Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility and forward head posture in unilateral migraine.单侧偏头痛中的肌筋膜触发点、颈部活动度和头前伸姿势
Cephalalgia. 2006 Sep;26(9):1061-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01162.x.
5
Myofascial trigger points in the suboccipital muscles in episodic tension-type headache.发作性紧张型头痛患者枕下肌中的肌筋膜触发点
Man Ther. 2006 Aug;11(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
6
The local and referred pain from myofascial trigger points in the temporalis muscle contributes to pain profile in chronic tension-type headache.颞肌肌筋膜触发点引起的局部疼痛和牵涉痛,是慢性紧张型头痛疼痛特征的一部分。
Clin J Pain. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(9):786-92. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318153496a.
7
Myofascial trigger points in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a blinded, controlled study.患有机械性颈部疼痛的受试者的肌筋膜触发点:一项双盲对照研究。
Man Ther. 2007 Feb;12(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.002.
8
Referred pain from trapezius muscle trigger points shares similar characteristics with chronic tension type headache.斜方肌触发点引起的牵涉痛与慢性紧张型头痛具有相似的特征。
Eur J Pain. 2007 May;11(4):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
9
Forward head posture and neck mobility in chronic tension-type headache: a blinded, controlled study.慢性紧张型头痛患者的头前伸姿势与颈部活动度:一项双盲对照研究。
Cephalalgia. 2006 Mar;26(3):314-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01042.x.
10
Neck mobility and forward head posture are not related to headache parameters in chronic tension-type headache.颈部活动度和头部前倾姿势与慢性紧张型头痛的头痛参数无关。
Cephalalgia. 2007 Feb;27(2):158-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01247.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Strength Training and Posture Correction of the Neck and Shoulder for Patients with Chronic Primary Headache: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study.慢性原发性头痛患者颈部和肩部的力量训练及姿势矫正:一项前瞻性单臂试点研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 29;14(15):5359. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155359.
2
Evaluation of the Craniovertebral Angle in Standing versus Sitting Positions in Young Adults with and without Severe Forward Head Posture.有无严重头前伸姿势的年轻成年人站立位与坐位时颅椎角的评估
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Jan 1;17(1):73-85. doi: 10.70252/GDNN4363. eCollection 2024.
3
Research Progress on the Experimental Model and Underlying Mechanistic Studies of Tension-Type Headaches.
紧张型头痛的实验模型与潜在机制研究进展。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 May;28(5):439-451. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01238-2. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
The relationship between myofascial trigger points sensitivity, cervical postural abnormality, and clinical tension-type headache parameters.肌筋膜触发点敏感性、颈椎姿势异常与临床紧张型头痛参数之间的关系。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Aug;32(4):390-399. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2299186. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
5
Does Tension Headache Have a Central or Peripheral Origin? Current State of Affairs.紧张性头痛的起源是中枢性还是外周性?现状。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023 Nov;27(11):801-810. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01179-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
6
Relationships Between Active Myofascial Trigger Points and Depressive Symptoms and Physical and Clinical Characteristics of Individuals With Shoulder Pain: A Cross-sectional Study.活跃肌筋膜触发点与肩部疼痛患者抑郁症状及身体和临床特征之间的关系:一项横断面研究
J Chiropr Med. 2022 Dec;21(4):249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
7
Structural rehabilitation of the cervical lordosis and forward head posture: a selective review of Chiropractic BioPhysics case reports.颈椎生理前凸和头前倾的结构康复:整脊生物物理学病例报告的选择性综述。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Nov;34(11):759-771. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.759. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Deep Cervical Muscles and Functionality in Patients with Chronic Tension-Type Headache: An Observational Study.慢性紧张型头痛患者的颈深肌及其功能:一项观察性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 10;58(7):917. doi: 10.3390/medicina58070917.
9
Current Understanding of the Pathophysiology and Approach to Tension-Type Headache.当前对紧张型头痛的病理生理学认识和处理方法。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Oct 2;21(10):56. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01138-7.
10
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.体外冲击波疗法与超声药物透入疗法治疗颈部肌筋膜疼痛综合征的随机临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May 1;11(2):e112592. doi: 10.5812/aapm.112592. eCollection 2021 Apr.