Department Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1298-302; discussion 12303. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318246584c.
To describe the quality indicators (QIs) that trauma centers use for quality measurement and performance improvement. Measuring and reporting quality of care is a critical step to improve the quality of care. QIs compare actual trauma care against ideal criteria and identify patients in whom care may have been suboptimal and should be further reviewed.
Three hundred thirty verified trauma centers in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand had their websites reviewed and leadership surveyed regarding QI use. The indicators identified were classified according to definition specifications, phase of care, Institute of Medicine aims, and contents.
Two hundred fifty-one centers responded to the survey (76%) and the majority (97%) indicated that they use QIs. We obtained 10,587 QIs from 262 centers (survey responses and website review) of which 1,102 were unique indicators. The QIs primarily assessed the safety (49%), effectiveness (32%), efficiency (27%), and timeliness (22%) of hospital processes (64%) and outcomes (24%). The majority of indicators were used by a small number of centers (551 of 1,102 unique indicators used by single centers).
Our study provides the first description of the QIs used by verified trauma centers in four high-income countries with similar systems of trauma care. The majority of trauma centers measure QIs designed to examine the safety, effectiveness, efficiency, and timeliness of hospital processes and outcomes. Opportunities exist to standardize existing QIs to allow broader implementation and develop new QIs to examine patient-centered care and equality of care.
描述创伤中心用于质量测量和绩效改进的质量指标 (QI)。测量和报告护理质量是改善护理质量的关键步骤。QI 将实际的创伤护理与理想标准进行比较,并确定护理可能不够理想的患者,应进一步审查。
对美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰的 330 家经过验证的创伤中心的网站进行了审查,并对领导层进行了关于 QI 使用情况的调查。确定的指标根据定义规范、护理阶段、美国医学研究所的目标和内容进行分类。
251 家中心对调查做出了回应(76%),大多数(97%)表示他们使用 QI。我们从 262 家中心(调查答复和网站审查)获得了 10587 个 QI,其中 1102 个是独特的指标。QI 主要评估医院流程(64%)和结果(24%)的安全性(49%)、有效性(32%)、效率(27%)和及时性(22%)。大多数指标仅被少数中心使用(1102 个独特指标中有 551 个仅被单个中心使用)。
我们的研究首次描述了四个高收入国家经证实的创伤中心使用的 QI,这些国家具有相似的创伤护理体系。大多数创伤中心测量旨在检查医院流程和结果的安全性、有效性、效率和及时性的 QI。有机会对现有的 QI 进行标准化,以允许更广泛的实施,并开发新的 QI 来检查以患者为中心的护理和护理平等。