Chambers Naomi, Benson Lawrence, Boyd Alan, Girling Jeff
University of Manchester - Manchester Business School, Manchester, UK.
Health Serv Manage Res. 2012 May;25(2):87-96. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2012.012015.
This paper sets out a theoretical framework for analyzing board governance, and describes an empirical study of corporate governance practices in a subset of non-profit organizations (hospices in the UK). It examines how practices in hospice governance compare with what is known about effective board working. We found that key strengths of hospice boards included a strong focus on the mission and the finances of the organizations, and common weaknesses included a lack of involvement in strategic matters and a lack of confidence, and some nervousness about challenging the organization on the quality of clinical care. Finally, the paper offers suggestions for theoretical development particularly in relation to board governance in non-profit organizations. It develops an engagement theory for boards which comprises a triadic proposition of high challenge, high support and strong grip.
本文提出了一个用于分析董事会治理的理论框架,并描述了对一部分非营利组织(英国的临终关怀医院)的公司治理实践的实证研究。它考察了临终关怀医院治理实践与已知的有效董事会运作情况相比如何。我们发现,临终关怀医院董事会的主要优势包括高度关注组织的使命和财务状况,而常见的弱点包括缺乏对战略事务的参与、缺乏信心,以及在质疑组织临床护理质量方面存在一些顾虑。最后,本文为理论发展提出了建议,特别是关于非营利组织董事会治理的建议。它为董事会发展了一种参与理论,该理论包含高挑战、高支持和强力掌控的三元命题。