Citterio O, Carioni N, Cabella R, Crespi-Porro R
Servizio di Radiodiagnostica, Ospedale Provinciale, Saronno, Varese.
Radiol Med. 1990 Nov;80(5):665-8.
To date, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) has been made primarily on clinical grounds and imaging techniques have been considered less useful. This paper is aimed at evaluating US utility in the diagnosis of AA. US scans of the appendix, after Puylaert, were obtained in 30 healthy subjects (group A), in 49 patients with recurrent pain in the iliac fossa (group B), and in 28 patients with clinical signs highly suggestive of AA (group C). In none of the subjects in group A was the appendix seen. Neither was it demonstrated in the patients in group B, all of whom underwent surgery and never presented with suppurating, phlegmonous, gangrenous, perforating AA and/or abscess. In the patients in group C, 20 of whom had a positive histology for AA, US demonstrated 17 true positive, 8 true negatives and 3 false negatives. We consider as useful in the diagnosis of AA the following US signs: 1) the appendix cannot be demonstrated, in which case AA is to be excluded; 2) the appendix can be seen and is still, non-compressible and exhibits thickened walls; 3) the appendix contains fecaliths. The latter 2 findings are suggestive of AA. Thus, US of the appendix is useful (100% specificity in group B) in excluding AA when clinical diagnosis is questionable, but the method proves less reliable (85% sensitivity in group C) when clinical presentation is more definite.
迄今为止,急性阑尾炎(AA)的诊断主要基于临床依据,而影像学技术一直被认为用处较小。本文旨在评估超声在AA诊断中的效用。按照普伊拉特的方法,对30名健康受试者(A组)、49名有髂窝反复疼痛的患者(B组)以及28名有高度提示AA临床体征的患者(C组)进行了阑尾超声扫描。A组受试者中均未见到阑尾。B组患者中也未显示阑尾,所有这些患者均接受了手术,且从未出现化脓性、蜂窝织炎性、坏疽性、穿孔性AA和/或脓肿。C组患者中,20例组织学检查确诊为AA,超声显示17例假阳性、8例假阴性和3例假阴性。我们认为以下超声征象对AA诊断有用:1)未显示阑尾,这种情况下可排除AA;2)可见阑尾,且阑尾静止不动、不可压缩且壁增厚;3)阑尾内有粪石。后两项发现提示AA。因此,当临床诊断存疑时,阑尾超声有助于排除AA(B组特异性为100%),但当临床表现更明确时,该方法的可靠性较低(C组敏感性为85%)。