• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性:临床和随访结果。

Safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elders: clinical and follow-up outcomes.

机构信息

Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Nov;27(11):1493-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1514-7. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-012-1514-7
PMID:22674345
Abstract

PURPOSE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently been applied to treatment of colorectal neoplasia; however, its safety and efficacy in terms of follow-up outcomes in elders have not been thoroughly examined. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD in elderly patients.

METHODS

Two groups of patients, elderly (≥ 75 years of age) and non-elderly (< 75 years of age), who underwent colorectal ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital from February 1998 to December 2010 were retrospectively compared on the following measures: tumor size, procedure time, complication rates, en bloc resection rates, and curative resection rates. We also investigated the follow-up outcomes in non-curative resection cases.

RESULTS

Of 614 consecutive patients treated by colorectal ESD, 125 (20.4 %) comprised the elderly group, and 489 patients (79.6 %) comprised the non-elderly group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of tumor size, procedure time, complication rates, en bloc resection rates, and curative resection rates. Of the patients who underwent non-curative resection, 7/19 (36.8 %) and 47/63 (74.6 %) in the elderly and non-elderly group, respectively, underwent additional treatment. Among the elderly patients who were followed up without additional treatment, no case of local recurrence, residual lesions, or distant metastases was observed during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcomes of colorectal ESD were equivalent in both groups. However, many of the non-curative cases in the elderly patients were followed up without additional treatment. Future studies should focus on the outcome in such patients to confirm the feasibility of colorectal ESD in elderly patients.

摘要

目的

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)最近已应用于结直肠肿瘤的治疗;然而,其在老年患者随访结果方面的安全性和有效性尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在描述老年患者结直肠 ESD 的临床结果。

方法

回顾性比较了 1998 年 2 月至 2010 年 12 月在国家癌症中心医院接受结直肠 ESD 的两组患者,即老年(≥75 岁)组和非老年(<75 岁)组,比较了肿瘤大小、手术时间、并发症发生率、整块切除率和根治性切除率。我们还调查了非根治性切除病例的随访结果。

结果

在 614 例连续接受结直肠 ESD 治疗的患者中,125 例(20.4%)为老年组,489 例(79.6%)为非老年组。两组患者在肿瘤大小、手术时间、并发症发生率、整块切除率和根治性切除率方面无显著差异。在非根治性切除的患者中,老年组的 7/19(36.8%)和非老年组的 47/63(74.6%)分别进行了额外治疗。在未接受额外治疗的老年患者中,在观察期间未发现局部复发、残留病变或远处转移。

结论

两组患者的结直肠 ESD 治疗结果相当。然而,老年患者中的许多非根治性病例未接受额外治疗。未来的研究应集中在这些患者的结果上,以确认老年患者行结直肠 ESD 的可行性。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elders: clinical and follow-up outcomes.老年人结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性:临床和随访结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Nov;27(11):1493-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1514-7. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
2
Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients.老年患者结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的长期疗效
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;32(4):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2719-y. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
3
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠上皮性肿瘤的长期疗效。
Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):723-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with or without snaring for colorectal neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合或不联合圈套用于结直肠肿瘤。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1248. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
5
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasms According to Clinical Indications.根据临床指征的结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的早期结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 May;59(5):403-10. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000549.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal cancer: is it feasible?内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗无蒂黏膜下浸润性结直肠癌:可行吗?
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;25(9):1051-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328361dd39.
7
Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years.80 岁以上患者内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的长期预后。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01899-y.
8
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-grade dysplasia and early-stage carcinoma in the colorectum.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠高级别上皮内瘤变和早期癌的长期疗效。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 Mar 21;38(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0273-4.
9
Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大肿瘤的临床疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
10
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大肿瘤的比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;23(11):1042-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834aa47b.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic factors and long-term outcomes with endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older.75岁及以上患者结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的预后因素及长期结局
DEN Open. 2025 May 6;6(1):e70137. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70137. eCollection 2026 Apr.
2
Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study.75 岁及以上患者经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的临床转归和长期预后:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Nov 21;39(1):188. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04765-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients.老年患者结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术疗效
JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):315-21. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13125733357070.
2
Colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly: limitations and drawbacks.老年人结直肠癌手术:局限性和缺陷。
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Oct;15 Suppl 1:S47-50. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0751-z.
3
Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer between younger and elderly patients: an analysis of 322 patients from a single institution.
Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
老年人内镜黏膜下剥离术患者肌少症的临床意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Aug;69(8):2970-2984. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08529-z. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in patients with severe comorbidities.重度合并症患者结直肠上皮性肿瘤内镜下黏膜下剥离术后的长期预后
JGH Open. 2023 Dec 6;7(12):974-981. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13016. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends.复杂结直肠息肉的内镜治疗:当前见解与未来趋势
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 20;8:728704. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728704. eCollection 2021.
6
Inverse Association of Age with Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Superficial Colorectal Cancer: A Large Population-Based Study.年龄与浅表性结直肠癌淋巴结转移风险呈负相关:一项基于大样本的研究。
Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):e920-e927. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0815. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection: double balloon endolumenal platform significantly improves dissection time compared with conventional technique (with video).辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术:双球囊内镜腔内平台与传统技术相比显著缩短剥离时间(附有视频)。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6336-4. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
8
Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients.老年患者结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的长期疗效
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;32(4):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2719-y. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.结直肠内镜下黏膜下剥离术:过去、现在及影响未来推广的因素
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015 Sep;28(3):146-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555006.
10
Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors.结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中根据部位的技术难度及穿孔危险因素
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jan;29(1):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3665-9. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
老年与年轻结直肠癌患者的临床病理特征差异:单中心 322 例患者分析。
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):574-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.014. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
4
Colorectal cancer in the elderly: characteristics and short term results.老年人大肠癌:特征和短期结果。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011 Aug;103(8):408-15. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082011000800004.
5
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age.结肠镜下黏膜剥离术治疗 80 岁以上老年患者。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):3000-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
6
[Predictors of functional decline of older persons after an hospitalisation in an acute care for elder unit: importance of recent functional evolution].[老年急性护理单元住院后老年人功能衰退的预测因素:近期功能演变的重要性]
Presse Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):e101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2010.05.023. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
7
A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video).一项针对 1111 例结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的前瞻性、多中心研究(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
8
Predictors of outcome following surgery in colonic perforation: an institution's experience over 6 years.结肠穿孔手术后结局的预测因素:一个机构 6 年的经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Feb;15(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1330-8. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
9
Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大肿瘤的临床疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasm.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠上皮性肿瘤
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1546-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0395-5. Epub 2009 Mar 5.