A multi-institution experience comparing the clinical and physiologic differences between upper extremity and lower extremity melphalan-based isolated limb infusion.

BACKGROUND

Although studies of melphalan-based isolated limb infusion (ILI) combine data from upper extremity (UE) treatments with those from lower extremity (LE) treatments, differences between the 2 may be clinically important.

METHODS

Candidates for UE ILI (n = 51) and LE ILI (n = 192) were identified from prospective databases at 2 institutions. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Wieberdink toxicity scale were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

The following patients had indications for UE ILI: melanoma, 36 of 47 patients (77%); sarcoma, 5 of 47 patients (11%); Merkel cell sarcoma, 3 of 47 patients (6%), and squamous cell carcinoma, 3 of 47 patients (6%). The patients who underwent UE ILI, as expected, had lower limb volumes (mean, 2.5 L vs 8.6 L; P < .001) and lower mean melphalan doses (20.7 mg vs 49.5 mg; P < .001). On perfusate blood gas analysis, the mean base excess at 30 minutes (-13.9 vs -9.1; P < .001) and the mean pH at 30 minutes (7.06 vs 7.15; P < .001) were lower for UE procedures than for LE procedures, although the mean ischemic time was longer in LE procedures (67.2 minutes) than in UE procedures (61.6 minutes; P = .03). The rate of regional toxicity grade ≥3 for UE ILI was 7% compared with 24% (P = .005) for LE ILI. There was no difference in the complete response rate for melanoma UE procedures (28%; 95% confidence interval, 16%-44%) compared with LE ILI procedures (32%; 95% confidence interval, 25%-39%).

CONCLUSIONS

ILI for UE disease was associated with similar complete response rates but lower toxicity than ILI for LE disease and with different physiologic sequelae despite comparable methods. The UE appears relatively resistant to toxic effects of melphalan-based ILI as currently performed, which suggests a potential for further optimization of drug dosing for UE ILI.