Pitfalls in statistical methods.
作者信息
Petretta Mario, Cuocolo Alberto
出版信息
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):818; author reply 819. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9580-3.
PMID:22674446
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Pitfalls in statistical methods.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):818; author reply 819. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9580-3.
2
Pitfalls in statistical methods.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):650-1. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9728-9.
3
Reply: Logistic regression, odds ratio, and factor variables.回复：逻辑回归、比值比和因子变量。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):652-3. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9729-8.
4
Reply: Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.回复：非心脏手术术前评估转诊至心肌灌注成像的临床结局与适宜性分级之间的相关性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):654. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9700-8. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
5
Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.术前非心脏手术前心肌灌注成像转诊的适宜性分级与临床结局的相关性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9462-0.
6
The time and place for appropriate radionuclide imaging: now and everywhere.进行适当放射性核素成像的时间和地点：当下及任何地点。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Dec;18(6):997-9. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9439-z.
7
The limitations of small outcome studies.小型结果研究的局限性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):230-2. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9521-1.
8
Myocardial perfusion imaging in very elderly patients with suspected coronary artery disease: never too late!老年疑似冠状动脉疾病患者的心肌灌注成像：永远不会太晚！
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):224-6. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9499-0.
9
Appropriateness of referrals for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in a developing community: a comparison between 2005 and 2009 versions of ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria.在一个发展中社区中单光子发射型计算机断层心肌灌注显像（SPECT-MPI）的转诊适宜性：2005 年和 2009 年版 ACCF/ASNC 适宜性标准的比较。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Dec;18(6):1044-52. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9419-3. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
10
Myocardial perfusion SPECT "screening" at the start of dialysis.透析开始时的心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描“筛查”。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):410-1. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9524-y.
引用本文的文献
1
Statistics decrypted-a comprehensive review and smartphone-assisted five-step approach for good statistical practice.统计学解密——全面综述及智能手机辅助的五步良好统计学实践方法。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Mar;407(2):529-540. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02360-0. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
Pitfalls in statistical methods.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):650-1. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9728-9.
3
Reply: Logistic regression, odds ratio, and factor variables.回复：逻辑回归、比值比和因子变量。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):652-3. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9729-8.
4
Reply: Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.回复：非心脏手术术前评估转诊至心肌灌注成像的临床结局与适宜性分级之间的相关性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):654. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9700-8. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
本文引用的文献
1
The limitations of small outcome studies.小型结果研究的局限性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):230-2. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9521-1.
2
Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.术前非心脏手术前心肌灌注成像转诊的适宜性分级与临床结局的相关性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9462-0.
3
Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion.二项比例的置信区间。
Stat Med. 1993 May 15;12(9):809-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780120902.
Zotero 插件