Garralda M E, McConachie H, Le Couteur A, Sriranjan S, Chakrabarti I, Cirak S, Guglieri M, Bushby K, Muntoni F
Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Child Care Health Dev. 2013 May;39(3):449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01387.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Gene-modifying trials offer hope for improvement in chronic paediatric disorders, but they may also lead to disappointment and have an adverse emotional effect on families. This study aimed to examine emotional impact on participants in a paediatric exon-skipping trial.
Nineteen male children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and their parents, taking part in a dose-ranging study of an i.v. administered morpholino splice-switching oligomer (which can restore the reading frame in DMD and induce dystrophin expression) underwent a psychosocial/psychiatric examination at trial entry. Emotional impact was assessed at trial completion using questionnaires.
The mean child age was 8.9 years (SD 2.1); 13(68%) were attending mainstream school. Most families were well adjusted psychosocially at trial entry. Post-trial median child emotional impact scores were 5/10 (n= 18), but impact was rated as positive by 6/14 (42%), neutral/mixed by 5 (35%) and negative by 3 (21%). Median post-trial psychosocial/psychiatric change scores in children and parents were minimal. Actual post-trial negative impact was statistically significantly associated with higher expected impact at trial entry, at which time the families of the three children displaying actual negative impact reported higher family stress levels in combination with a variety of other psychosocial risks factors.
In carefully selected families with low levels of psychosocial stress/distress at trial entry, and with good support from paediatric research units (including psychiatric input when required), genetic trials in progressive disorders such as DMD can have a predominantly positive or neutral emotional impact. Nevertheless, negative impact is reported by a minority of families and possible psychosocial predictors deserving further scrutiny have been identified.
基因编辑试验为改善儿童慢性疾病带来了希望,但也可能令人失望,并对家庭产生不良情绪影响。本研究旨在探讨一项儿科外显子跳跃试验对参与者的情绪影响。
19名患有杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)的男童及其父母参与了一项静脉注射吗啉代剪接转换寡聚物(可恢复DMD的阅读框并诱导抗肌萎缩蛋白表达)的剂量范围研究,在试验开始时接受了社会心理/精神检查。在试验结束时使用问卷评估情绪影响。
儿童的平均年龄为8.9岁(标准差2.1);13名(68%)就读于主流学校。大多数家庭在试验开始时社会心理适应良好。试验后儿童情绪影响得分中位数为5/10(n = 18),但6/14(42%)的人认为影响是积极的,5名(35%)认为是中性/混合的,3名(21%)认为是消极的。儿童和父母试验后的社会心理/精神变化得分中位数极小。试验后实际的负面影响与试验开始时较高的预期影响在统计学上显著相关,在试验开始时,三名显示出实际负面影响的儿童家庭报告了较高的家庭压力水平以及各种其他社会心理风险因素。
在试验开始时精心挑选的社会心理压力/痛苦水平较低且得到儿科研究单位良好支持(包括必要时的精神科投入)的家庭中,诸如DMD等进行性疾病的基因试验可能主要产生积极或中性的情绪影响。然而,少数家庭报告了负面影响,并且已确定了值得进一步审查的可能的社会心理预测因素。