Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ergonomics. 2012;55(8):946-62. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.681809. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
Studies are reported in which participants moved from a starting position to a final target, but moved around obstacles that prevented a direct path being taken. Seven experiments are reported in which subjects made multiple-component movements, defined by changes in the direction of movement, but without intervening targets (or stopping points) between components. It was found that components of movement time did not interact, contrary to the results of Gan and Hoffmann (1988b) for cases where there was an intervening target, and that component times could be added. For ballistic components, the time for the movement was linearly related to the square root of the total amplitude of movement; for components that were visually controlled, the time was related to Fitts' Index of Difficulty based on the total amplitude of movement and the final target size. Results are compared to data for movements with intervening targets, where the movement integration hypothesis is valid.
Many movements, particularly to inaccessible places, cannot be made directly, but must be made about obstacles in the path. This research shows how times for these movements can be quantified in terms of the direct path length and the size and location of the obstacles.
本研究报告中,参与者从起始位置移动到最终目标,但在移动过程中会遇到障碍物,无法直接通过。本研究报告了 7 项实验,实验中受试者进行了多组件运动,运动方向发生变化,但组件之间没有中间目标(或停止点)。结果发现,运动时间的组成部分没有相互作用,这与 Gan 和 Hoffmann(1988b)在有中间目标的情况下的结果相反,并且可以对组件时间进行相加。对于弹道组件,运动时间与运动总幅度的平方根呈线性关系;对于视觉控制的组件,运动时间与基于运动总幅度和最终目标大小的 Fitts 难度指数相关。结果与具有中间目标的运动数据进行了比较,在这些数据中,运动整合假说成立。
许多运动,特别是到难以到达的地方的运动,不能直接进行,而是必须绕过路径中的障碍物。本研究展示了如何根据直接路径长度以及障碍物的大小和位置来量化这些运动的时间。