Suppr超能文献

选择性注意和三过程记忆模型对肌萎缩侧索硬化症言语自由回忆的解释。

Selective attention and the three-process memory model for the interpretation of verbal free recall in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Clinical Neuropsychology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Sep;18(5):809-18. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000562. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Abstract

The present study investigates selective attention and verbal free recall in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and examines the contribution of selective attention, encoding, consolidation, and retrieval memory processes to patients' verbal free recall. We examined 22 non-demented patients with sporadic ALS and 22 demographically related controls using Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test (SNST; selective attention) and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; immediate & delayed verbal free recall). The item-specific deficit approach (ISDA) was applied to RAVLT to evaluate encoding, consolidation, and retrieval difficulties. ALS patients performed worse than controls on SNST (p < .001) and RAVLT immediate and delayed recall (p < .001) and showed deficient encoding (p = .001) and consolidation (p = .002) but not retrieval (p = .405). Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that SNST and ISDA indices accounted for: (a) 91.1% of the variance in RAVLT immediate recall, with encoding (p = .016), consolidation (p < .001), and retrieval (p = .032) significantly contributing to the overall model and the SNST alone accounting for 41.6%; and (b) 85.2% of the variance in RAVLT delayed recall, with consolidation (p < .001) and retrieval (p = .008) significantly contributing to the overall model and the SNST alone accounting for 39.8%. Thus, selective attention, encoding, and consolidation, and to a lesser extent of retrieval, influenced both immediate and delayed verbal free recall. Concluding, selective attention and the memory processes of encoding, consolidation, and retrieval should be considered while interpreting patients' impaired free recall. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1-10).

摘要

本研究调查了肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)中的选择性注意和言语自由回忆,并研究了选择性注意、编码、巩固和检索记忆过程对患者言语自由回忆的贡献。我们使用 Stroop 神经心理筛查测试(SNST;选择性注意)和 Rey 听觉言语学习测试(RAVLT;即时和延迟言语自由回忆)检查了 22 名非痴呆的散发性 ALS 患者和 22 名与人口统计学相关的对照组。RAVLT 采用项目特异性缺陷方法(ISDA)评估编码、巩固和检索困难。ALS 患者在 SNST(p<.001)和 RAVLT 即时和延迟回忆(p<.001)上的表现均差于对照组,并且表现出编码(p=.001)和巩固(p=.002)缺陷,但检索无缺陷(p=.405)。层次回归分析显示,SNST 和 ISDA 指数解释了:(a)RAVLT 即时回忆的 91.1%的方差,其中编码(p=.016)、巩固(p<.001)和检索(p=.032)对整体模型有显著贡献,而 SNST 单独解释了 41.6%;(b)RAVLT 延迟回忆的 85.2%的方差,其中巩固(p<.001)和检索(p=.008)对整体模型有显著贡献,而 SNST 单独解释了 39.8%。因此,选择性注意、编码、巩固和检索,在一定程度上也包括检索,影响了即时和延迟言语自由回忆。总之,在解释患者的自由回忆受损时,应考虑选择性注意和编码、巩固、检索等记忆过程。(JINS,2012,18,1-10)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验