Women's Health Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Psychosomatics. 2012 Jul-Aug;53(4):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
Patients with fibromyalgia often experience depressive symptoms in addition to chronic pain and other characteristic symptoms associated with this disorder.
To examine the relationships among pain, depressive symptoms, and global status in a clinical trial of milnacipran for fibromyalgia.
Data from a randomized, double-blind study (milnacipran 100 mg/d, n = 516; placebo, n = 509) were analyzed. Treatment outcomes included quantitative changes in pain and Beck depression inventory (BDI) scores, mean Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores, and three responder endpoints: patients with ≥30% pain improvement, PGIC score ≤2, and patients meeting both pain and PGIC responder criteria (2-measure composite responders). Correlations and path analyses were conducted to evaluate relationships among improvements in depressive symptoms, pain, and PGIC.
Patients receiving milnacipran had greater decreases in mean pain scores, lower mean PGIC endpoint scores, and higher responder rates regardless of baseline severity of depressive symptoms. The highest responder rates were found in patients with greater than four-point improvement in BDI scores (milnacipran vs. placebo: pain, 57.5% vs. 39.0%; PGIC, 60.1% vs. 38.2%; 2-measure composite, 49.0% vs. 27.9%; all p < 0.01), although significant differences between treatment groups were also found in patients with no improvement or worsening of depressive symptoms. Correlations between changes in BDI and changes in pain or PGIC were low (r ≤ 0.3). Path analyses indicated 87.2% of pain reduction to be a direct effect of milnacipran treatment.
Symptom improvements with milnacipran were only weakly associated with baseline depressive symptoms and were largely independent of improvements in depressive symptomatology.
纤维肌痛患者除了慢性疼痛和与该疾病相关的其他特征性症状外,通常还会出现抑郁症状。
在一项米那普仑治疗纤维肌痛的临床试验中,研究疼痛、抑郁症状和整体状况之间的关系。
对一项随机、双盲研究(米那普仑 100mg/d,n=516;安慰剂,n=509)的数据进行了分析。治疗结果包括疼痛和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评分的定量变化、平均患者总体印象变化(PGIC)评分以及三个应答终点:疼痛改善≥30%的患者、PGIC 评分≤2 的患者以及同时满足疼痛和 PGIC 应答标准的患者(2 项测量综合应答者)。进行相关性和路径分析,以评估抑郁症状、疼痛和 PGIC 改善之间的关系。
接受米那普仑治疗的患者疼痛平均评分下降更大,PGIC 终点评分更低,应答率更高,无论基线抑郁症状严重程度如何。BDI 评分改善超过 4 分的患者应答率最高(米那普仑 vs. 安慰剂:疼痛,57.5% vs. 39.0%;PGIC,60.1% vs. 38.2%;2 项测量综合,49.0% vs. 27.9%;所有 p<0.01),尽管在抑郁症状无改善或恶化的患者中,治疗组之间也存在显著差异。BDI 变化与疼痛或 PGIC 变化之间的相关性较低(r≤0.3)。路径分析表明,疼痛缓解的 87.2%是米那普仑治疗的直接效应。
米那普仑的症状改善与基线抑郁症状仅有微弱关联,并且在很大程度上与抑郁症状的改善无关。