Vascular and Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1275-82. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0967-z. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
This study aims to assess perioperative incidence of wound hematoma and bleeding in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under dual antiplatelet therapy.
Consecutive patients with initial CEA receiving aspirin, clopidogrel, or a combination of both were subjected to standard patch endarterectomy. Postoperative wound hematoma was assessed as moderate (subcutaneous bleeding, nonspace-occupying hematoma, and oozing suture bleeding) or severe, i.e., needing operative re-exploration.
Six hundred eighty-four (80.9%) patients with one of the three types of antiplatelet therapy out of 844 patients registered from 1995 to 2010 were enrolled. Wound hematoma occurred in 27 of 112 (24.1%) patients under combined aspirin and clopidogrel, 33 of 162 (20.4%) under clopidogrel, and 48 of 410 (11.7 %) under aspirin. Relative risk compared to aspirin was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.1) for aspirin and clopidogrel and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2 to 3.1) for clopidogrel. Severe space-occupying hematoma needing operative re-exploration occurred in four (3.6%) patients under aspirin and clopidogrel, seven (4.3%) under clopidogrel, and five (1.2%) under aspirin. Corresponding relative risks were 3.0 (95% CI, 0.8 to 11.4) for aspirin and clopidogrel and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.1 to 11.7) for clopidogrel. Relative risks remained without relevant change after adjustment for potentially confounding variables.
Dual antiplatelet therapy with combined aspirin and clopidogrel as well as clopidogrel is associated with an increased incidence of perioperative wound hematoma compared to aspirin but on an acceptable low level of incidence. The latter may be achieved by adapting operative procedures to more intensive antiplatelet regimes.
本研究旨在评估接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)并接受双联抗血小板治疗的患者围手术期伤口血肿和出血的发生率。
连续纳入接受标准补丁内膜切除术的初始 CEA 并接受阿司匹林、氯吡格雷或两者联合治疗的患者。术后伤口血肿评估为中度(皮下出血、非占位性血肿和缝线渗血)或重度,即需要手术再次探查。
1995 年至 2010 年间登记的 844 例患者中,有 684 例(80.9%)接受了三种抗血小板治疗中的一种。在联合使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的 112 例患者中,27 例(24.1%)发生伤口血肿;在接受氯吡格雷治疗的 162 例患者中,33 例(20.4%)发生伤口血肿;在接受阿司匹林治疗的 410 例患者中,48 例(11.7%)发生伤口血肿。与阿司匹林相比,阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷的相对风险为 2.4(95%可信区间,1.4 至 4.1),氯吡格雷为 1.9(95%可信区间,1.2 至 3.1)。需要手术再次探查的严重占位性血肿在联合使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的 4 例患者(3.6%)、氯吡格雷的 7 例患者(4.3%)和阿司匹林的 5 例患者(1.2%)中发生。相应的相对风险分别为 3.0(95%可信区间,0.8 至 11.4)和 3.7(95%可信区间,1.1 至 11.7)。调整潜在混杂因素后,相对风险无明显变化。
与阿司匹林相比,联合使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷以及氯吡格雷的双联抗血小板治疗与围手术期伤口血肿发生率增加相关,但发生率处于可接受的低水平。通过调整手术操作以适应更强化的抗血小板治疗方案,可以达到后者。