Neuroscience Department, Physiology Division, University of Torino Medical School, Torino, Italy.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Aug 15;113(4):524-31. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00237.2012. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
Several mechanisms have been hypothesized to contribute to the rapid hyperemia at the onset of exercise. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role played by the mechanosensitivity of the vascular network. In 12 anesthetized rabbits blood flow was recorded from the exclusively muscular masseteric artery in response to brief spontaneous contractions (BSC) of the masseter muscle, artery occlusion (AO), muscle compression (MC), and muscle stretch (MS). Activation of masseter muscle was monitored by electromyography (EMG). Responses to AO were also recorded from the mostly cutaneous facial and the central ear arteries. Five animals were also tested in the awake condition. The hyperemic response to BSC (peak amplitude of 394 ± 82%; time to peak of 1.8 ± 0.8 s) developed with a latency of 300-400 ms from the beginning of the EMG burst and 200-300 ms from the contraction-induced transient flow reduction. This response was neither different from the response to AO (peak amplitude = 426 ± 158%), MC, and MS (P = 0.23), nor from the BSC response in the awake condition. Compared with the masseteric artery, the response to AO was markedly smaller both in the facial (83 ± 18%,) and in the central ear artery (68 ± 20%) (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the rapid contraction-induced hyperemia can be replicated by a variety of stimuli affecting transmural pressure in muscle blood vessels and is thus compatible with the Bayliss effect. This prominent mechanosensitivity appears to be a characteristic of muscle and not cutaneous vascular beds.
几种机制被假设有助于运动起始时的快速充血。本研究旨在探讨血管网络的机械敏感性所起的作用。在 12 只麻醉兔中,通过短暂的自发性咀嚼肌收缩(BSC)、动脉闭塞(AO)、肌肉压迫(MC)和肌肉拉伸(MS),记录来自专门的咀嚼肌动脉的血流。咀嚼肌的激活通过肌电图(EMG)进行监测。还从主要为皮肤的面部和中央耳动脉记录对 AO 的反应。5 只动物也在清醒状态下进行了测试。BSC 的充血反应(峰值幅度为 394 ± 82%;达峰时间为 1.8 ± 0.8 s)在 EMG 爆发开始后 300-400 ms 时开始,并在收缩引起的瞬时血流减少后 200-300 ms 时开始。这种反应与 AO 的反应(峰值幅度= 426 ± 158%)、MC 和 MS 没有差异(P = 0.23),也与清醒状态下的 BSC 反应没有差异。与咀嚼肌动脉相比,AO 在面部(83 ± 18%)和中央耳动脉(68 ± 20%)中的反应明显较小(P < 0.01)。总之,多种刺激可复制快速收缩引起的充血,这些刺激影响肌肉血管的跨壁压力,因此与贝利斯效应一致。这种明显的机械敏感性似乎是肌肉血管床的特征,而不是皮肤血管床的特征。