• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用床旁即时检验检测氯吡格雷抵抗可预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局。

High post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary stenting.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1877-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.154. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.154
PMID:22682702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that post-clopidogrel high platelet reactivity (HPR), assessed by a point-of-care assay, is associated with a higher risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed the clinical impact of HPR by the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care assay in 181 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) at 3 hospitals.

METHODS

The primary endpoint of the study was the 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which comprised cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI and ischemic stroke. All patients received a single loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel and 300 mg aspirin followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel and 100mg aspirin.

RESULTS

A P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≥ 282 (AUC 0.719, 95% CI 0.588-0.851, p=0.004, sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 73.8%) was the optimal cut-off value in predicting 12-month MACE by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Occurrence of MACE was significantly more frequent in patients with HPR (PRU ≥ 282) compared to patients without HPR (20.4% vs. 3.9%, HR 6.24, 95% CI 2.05-18.99, p=0.001). By multivariate analysis, HPR (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.17-12.58, p=0.026) and elderly patients above 80 years of age (HR: 8.13, 95% CI 1.79-37.03, p=0.007) were found to be the significant predictors of 12-month MACE. The MACE-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with HPR compared to patients without HPR (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

HPR assessed by a point-of-care assay was able to predict 12-month MACE in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI with DES.

摘要

背景

最近的研究表明,通过即时检测(point-of-care assay)评估的氯吡格雷抵抗后高血小板反应性(HPR)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不良事件的风险增加相关。我们在 3 家医院中评估了 181 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受药物洗脱支架(DES)的直接 PCI 后,通过 VerifyNow P2Y12 即时检测评估 HPR 的临床影响。

方法

研究的主要终点是 12 个月的主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和缺血性卒中。所有患者接受单次负荷剂量 600mg 氯吡格雷和 300mg 阿司匹林,随后每天维持剂量 75mg 氯吡格雷和 100mg 阿司匹林。

结果

通过接受者操作特征曲线分析,P2Y12 反应单位(PRU)≥282(AUC 0.719,95%CI 0.588-0.851,p=0.004,敏感性 68.8%,特异性 73.8%)是预测 12 个月 MACE 的最佳截断值。与无 HPR(PRU<282)的患者相比,HPR(PRU≥282)患者的 MACE 发生率明显更高(20.4%比 3.9%,HR 6.24,95%CI 2.05-18.99,p=0.001)。多变量分析显示,HPR(HR 3.84,95%CI 1.17-12.58,p=0.026)和 80 岁以上的老年患者(HR:8.13,95%CI 1.79-37.03,p=0.007)是 12 个月 MACE 的显著预测因素。与无 HPR 的患者相比,HPR 患者的 MACE 无事件生存率明显较低(p<0.001)。

结论

通过即时检测评估的 HPR 可预测接受 DES 直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者 12 个月的 MACE。

相似文献

1
High post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary stenting.采用床旁即时检验检测氯吡格雷抵抗可预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1877-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.154. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
2
Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay: a 12-month follow-up.通过即时检验检测的急性冠状动脉综合征患者对ADP的残余血小板反应性可预测接受冠状动脉支架植入术患者的心血管死亡和非致死性心肌梗死:一项12个月的随访研究
Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):237-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812636. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
3
Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the Stent Thrombosis In Belgium (STIB) trial.稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血小板反应性与心血管事件:比利时支架血栓形成(STIB)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):204-11. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A34.
4
Posttreatment platelet reactivity on clopidogrel is associated with the risk of adverse events after off-pump coronary artery bypass.氯吡格雷治疗后的血小板反应性与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路术后不良事件的风险相关。
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):818-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
5
Point-of-care testing of clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition and risk for cardiovascular events after coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.氯吡格雷介导的血小板抑制的即时检验以及冠状动脉造影术后伴或不伴经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管事件风险
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014 Sep;25(6):577-84. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000103.
6
Point-of-care assessment of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel to predict myonecrosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者氯吡格雷治疗后血小板反应性的即时检测对心肌坏死的预测作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.012.
7
Usefulness of platelet response to clopidogrel by point-of-care testing to predict bleeding outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Antiplatelet Therapy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bleeding Study).应用即时检验评估血小板对氯吡格雷的反应预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血结局的价值(来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗血小板治疗减少心肌损伤-出血研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
8
Randomized comparison of new dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, prasugrel) and triple-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol) using P2Y12 point-of-care assay in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,使用 P2Y12 即时检验(point-of-care assay)进行新的双联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林、普拉格雷)与三联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、西洛他唑)的随机比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 20;168(1):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.093. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
9
Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study.氯吡格雷反应性的床旁检测可预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床结局:ARMYDA-PRO(血管成形术期间减少心肌损伤的抗血小板治疗 - 血小板反应性预测结局)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 30;52(14):1128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.038.
10
High on clopidogrel treatment platelet reactivity is frequent in acute and rare in elective stenting and can be functionally overcome by switch of therapy.氯吡格雷治疗时血小板高反应性在急性支架置入术中很常见,而在择期支架置入术中很少见,可以通过治疗转换来功能性克服。
Thromb Res. 2014 Feb;133(2):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.11.029. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Platelet activity with hemoglobin level in patients with hemodialysis: Prospective study.血液透析患者血小板活性与血红蛋白水平的前瞻性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19336. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019336.
2
Platelet Inhibition, Endothelial Function, and Clinical Outcome in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Randomized to Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Maintenance Therapy: Long-Term Follow-Up of the REDUCE-MVI Trial.血小板抑制、内皮功能和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受替格瑞洛与普拉格雷维持治疗的临床结局:REDCUE-MVI 试验的长期随访。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e014411. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014411.
3
Both CYP2C19 and PON1 Q192R Genotypes Influence Platelet Response to Clopidogrel by Thrombelastography in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
CYP2C19 和 PON1 Q192R 基因型通过血栓弹力描记法影响急性冠状动脉综合征患者氯吡格雷的血小板反应。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Jul 18;2019:3470145. doi: 10.1155/2019/3470145. eCollection 2019.
4
Half-dose ticagrelor versus high-dose clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (divide study).替格瑞洛半量与高剂量氯吡格雷降低氯吡格雷高反应性急性冠脉综合征患者血小板反应性(DIVIDE 研究)。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;75(8):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02687-0. Epub 2019 May 12.
5
Genotyping of six clopidogrel-metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms has a minor role in the assessment of platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome.六种氯吡格雷代谢酶多态性的基因分型在评估急性冠状动脉综合征患者的血小板反应性方面作用较小。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;17(4):303-312. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7390. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
A pharmacodynamic study of the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor regimen for East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome.东亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者最佳P2Y12抑制剂治疗方案的药效学研究
Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Sep;30(5):620-8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.5.620. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
7
Lower loading dose of prasugrel compared with conventional loading doses of clopidogrel and prasugrel in korean patients undergoing elective coronary angiography: a randomized controlled study evaluating pharmacodynamic efficacy.在接受选择性冠状动脉造影的韩国患者中,与氯吡格雷和普拉格雷的传统负荷剂量相比,普拉格雷的负荷剂量较低:一项评估药效学疗效的随机对照研究。
Korean Circ J. 2014 Nov;44(6):386-93. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2014.44.6.386. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
The prognostic impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity with aspirin or ADP receptor antagonists: systematic review and meta-analysis.使用阿司匹林或 ADP 受体拮抗剂时治疗期间高血小板反应性的预后影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:610296. doi: 10.1155/2014/610296. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
"East asian paradox": challenge for the current antiplatelet strategy of "one-guideline-fits-all races" in acute coronary syndrome.“东亚悖论”:急性冠脉综合征“一种策略适合所有种族”的现行抗血小板策略的挑战。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 May;16(5):485. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0485-4.
10
Randomized Comparison of the Platelet Inhibitory Efficacy between Low Dose Prasugrel and Standard Dose Clopidogrel in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷的血小板抑制效果随机比较。
Korean Circ J. 2014 Mar;44(2):82-8. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2014.44.2.82. Epub 2014 Mar 12.