• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内外六方平台转换种植体-基台连接的生物力学评估:体外实验室和三维有限元分析。

Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.

机构信息

Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2012 Oct;28(10):e218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004
PMID:22682782
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of abutment's diameter shifting on reliability and stress distribution within the implant-abutment connection for internal and external hexagon implants. The postulated hypothesis was that platform-switched implants would result in increased stress concentration within the implant-abutment connection, leading to the systems' lower reliability.

METHODS

Eighty-four implants were divided in four groups (n=21): REG-EH and SWT-EH (regular and switched-platform implants with external connection, respectively); REG-IH and SWT-IH (regular and switched-platform implants with internal connection, respectively). The corresponding abutments were screwed to the implants and standardized maxillary central incisor metal crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing. Use-level probability Weibull curves and reliability were calculated. Four finite element models reproducing the characteristics of specimens used in laboratory testing were created. The models were full constrained on the bottom and lateral surface of the cylinder of acrylic resin and one 30° off-axis load (300N) was applied on the lingual side of the crown (close to the incisal edge) in order to evaluate the stress distribution (s(vM)) within the implant-abutment complex.

RESULTS

The Beta values for groups SWT-EH (1.31), REG-EH (1.55), SWT-IH (1.83) and REG-IH (1.82) indicated that fatigue accelerated the failure of all groups. The higher levels of σ(vM) within the implant-abutment connection observed for platform-switched implants (groups SWT-EH and SWT-IH) were in agreement with the lower reliability observed for the external hex implants, but not for the internal hex implants. The reliability 90% confidence intervals (50,000 cycles at 300N) were 0.53(0.33-0.70), 0.93(0.80-0.97), 0.99(0.93-0.99) and 0.99(0.99-1.00), for the SWT-EH, REG-EH, SWT-IH, and REH-IH, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

The postulated hypothesis was partially accepted. The higher levels of stress observed within implant-abutment connection when reducing abutment diameter (cross-sectional area) resulted in lower reliability for external hex implants, but not for internal hex implants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估基台直径变化对内六角种植体-基台连接的可靠性和应力分布的影响。假设平台转换种植体将导致种植体-基台连接内的应力集中增加,从而降低系统的可靠性。

方法

将 84 个种植体分为四组(n=21):REG-EH 和 SWT-EH(分别为带外连接的常规和平台转换种植体);REG-IH 和 SWT-IH(分别为带内连接的常规和平台转换种植体)。将相应的基台拧到种植体上,并将标准化的上颌中切牙金属冠粘接到种植体上,然后进行阶跃应力加速寿命测试。计算使用水平概率威布尔曲线和可靠性。创建了四个有限元模型,以复制实验室测试中使用的样本的特征。模型在丙烯酸树脂圆柱体的底部和侧面完全受限,并在冠的舌侧(靠近切缘)施加 30°偏轴载荷(300N),以评估种植体-基台复合体内部的应力分布(s(vM))。

结果

SWT-EH 组(1.31)、REG-EH 组(1.55)、SWT-IH 组(1.83)和 REG-IH 组(1.82)的 Beta 值表明,疲劳加速了所有组的失效。在平台转换种植体(SWT-EH 和 SWT-IH 组)中观察到的较高水平的 s(vM)在种植体-基台连接内与外部六角种植体较低的可靠性一致,但与内部六角种植体不一致。SWT-EH、REG-EH、SWT-IH 和 REG-IH 组的可靠性 90%置信区间(300N 时 50,000 次循环)分别为 0.53(0.33-0.70)、0.93(0.80-0.97)、0.99(0.93-0.99)和 0.99(0.99-1.00)。

意义

假设的部分被接受。当减小基台直径(横截面积)时,在种植体-基台连接内观察到的较高水平的应力导致外部六角种植体的可靠性降低,但对内部六角种植体则不然。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.内外六方平台转换种植体-基台连接的生物力学评估:体外实验室和三维有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2012 Oct;28(10):e218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
2
Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.常规与平台转换:不同种植体类型的骨应力量分析。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Apr;21(3):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00801.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
3
Implant-abutment connection designs for anterior crowns: reliability and failure modes.前牙冠的种植体-基台连接设计:可靠性与失效模式。
Implant Dent. 2013 Oct;22(5):540-5. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829f1f2d.
4
Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections.不同种植体/基台连接的种植体支持的前牙冠的机械测试。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):103-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2443.
5
Influence of abutment-to-fixture design on reliability and failure mode of all-ceramic crown systems.基台-修复体设计对全瓷冠系统可靠性和失效模式的影响。
Dent Mater. 2014 Apr;30(4):408-16. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
6
Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.平台连接和基台材料对单颗前牙种植支持修复体应力分布的影响:非线性三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 13.
7
Fatigue Failure of Narrow Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体-基台连接设计的窄径种植体疲劳失效
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):659-664. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12540. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Survival Probability of Narrow and Standard-Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体-基台连接设计的窄直径和标准直径种植体的生存概率
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):179-85. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4232.
9
Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.平台转换:使用三维有限元分析的生物力学评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):482-91.
10
Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns: regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform.种植体-基台连接设计对冠修复体可靠性的影响:常规与水平不匹配平台。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Sep;23(9):1123-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02257.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of bulk material on the reliability and failure mode of narrow implants.块状材料对窄种植体可靠性及失效模式的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2025 Aug;133(4):e70021. doi: 10.1111/eos.70021. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Relationship Between Implant Connection and Implant Fracture: Systematic Review.种植体连接与种植体骨折之间的关系:系统评价
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 23;12(4):333. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040333.
3
Patient-, implant- and prosthetic-related factors on peri-implant mucositis and bone loss.患者相关因素、种植体相关因素和修复体相关因素对种植体周围黏膜炎和骨丧失的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 May 13;38:e040. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0040. eCollection 2024.
4
A 10-year follow-up study on clinical outcomes of dental implant rehabilitation using surgical guide.一项关于使用手术导板进行牙种植修复临床结果的10年随访研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Apr 30;50(2):70-79. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.2.70.
5
Reliability and Failure Mode of Ti-Base Abutments Supported by Narrow/Wide Implant Systems.窄/宽种植体系统支持的钛基基台的可靠性和失效模式。
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;11(9):207. doi: 10.3390/dj11090207.
6
Biomechanical effects of original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket abutment screws in zirconia abutment on dental implant assembly.氧化锆基台原厂和售后市场基台螺丝对牙种植体装配的生物力学影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 27;10(1):18406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75469-9.
7
Failure Modes and Survival of Anterior Crowns Supported by Narrow Implant Systems.窄种植体系统支持的前牙冠的失效模式和存活率。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Sep 7;2020:1057846. doi: 10.1155/2020/1057846. eCollection 2020.
8
A Comparative Analysis of Implants Presenting Different Diameters: Extra-Narrow, Narrow and Conventional.不同直径种植体的比较分析:超窄、窄型和常规型。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 17;13(8):1888. doi: 10.3390/ma13081888.
9
Biomaterial-based possibilities for managing peri-implantitis.基于生物材料的方法治疗种植体周围炎的可能性。
J Periodontal Res. 2020 Apr;55(2):165-173. doi: 10.1111/jre.12707. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
10
A Finite Element Analysis to Compare Stress Distribution on Extra-Short Implants with Two Different Internal Connections.一项有限元分析,用于比较具有两种不同内部连接方式的超短种植体上的应力分布。
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 25;8(8):1103. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081103.