NOAA, National Ocean Service, Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, Charleston, SC, USA.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2012 Jul;64(7):1291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
The precise application of risk assessment can lead to different conclusions about risk depending on how species are grouped in the assessment. We compared the use of different risk assessment methods for three different classes of pesticide, the herbicide diuron, the fungicide chlorothalonil, and the insecticide permethrin for marine and estuarine species. Permethrin was the most toxic pesticide to marine and estuarine crustaceans. Diuron was the most toxic pesticide to algae, and chlorothalonil was most toxic to early life stages of molluscs and other invertebrates. Toxicity data (96 h LC50/EC50 values) were analyzed using a probability distribution on the ranked toxicity values and 10th centile values were calculated based on different groups of species and for all species combined. Our results indicate that an assessment of risk based on smaller taxonomic groups can be informative, especially for pesticides of less specific modes of action such as chlorothalonil.
风险评估的精确应用可能会导致对风险的不同结论,具体取决于评估中如何对物种进行分组。我们比较了三种不同类别的农药(除草剂敌草隆、杀菌剂百菌清和杀虫剂氯菊酯)对海洋和河口物种的不同风险评估方法的应用。氯菊酯对海洋和河口甲壳类动物的毒性最大。敌草隆对藻类的毒性最大,百菌清对软体动物和其他无脊椎动物的早期生命阶段毒性最大。使用基于排序毒性值的概率分布分析毒性数据(96 h LC50/EC50 值),并基于不同的物种组和所有物种的综合数据计算第 10 个百分位数值。我们的研究结果表明,基于较小的分类群进行风险评估可能会很有帮助,尤其是对于作用模式不太特异的农药,如百菌清。