Department of Social Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Aug;23(4):701-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks060. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Most but not all evidence supports hostility-related attributes to increase mortality risk. However, studies usually include single attributes, their effects have been studied predominantly in younger populations, and behavioural pathways explaining the mortality effect seem to differ by age. We examined the relationship between all-cause mortality and cognitive hostility, anger, aggression and rebelliousness, and their independence of health behaviours in a late middle-aged and older population.
Data were derived from the longitudinal Dutch Study of Medical Information and Lifestyles in the city of Eindhoven, in the Southeast of the Netherlands study among 2679 late middle-aged and older Dutch people. Psychological characteristics were self-reported in 2004/2005, and mortality was monitored from 2005 to 2010. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate the mortality risk by each unique psychological variable with additional adjustments for the other psychological variables and for health behaviours. Baseline adjustments included age, sex, educational level and prevalent morbidity.
Cognitive hostility was associated with all-cause mortality, independent of health behaviours (on a scale ranging from 6 to 30, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.05; 95% confidence interval [95% CI): 1.01-1.09]. Anger, aggression and rebelliousness were not associated with mortality risk.
In diminishing excess mortality risks, hostile cognitions might be acknowledged separately and additionally to the risk posed by unhealthy lifestyles.
大多数(但不是全部)证据表明,与敌意相关的属性会增加死亡风险。然而,这些研究通常只包含单一属性,它们的影响主要在年轻人群中进行了研究,而且解释死亡率效应的行为途径似乎因年龄而异。我们在一个中老年人群中研究了全因死亡率与认知敌意、愤怒、攻击和叛逆之间的关系,以及它们与健康行为的独立性。
数据来自荷兰东南部城市埃因霍温的医疗信息和生活方式纵向研究,该研究在 2679 名中老年荷兰人中进行。2004/2005 年报告了心理特征,2005 年至 2010 年监测了死亡率。使用 Cox 回归分析计算了每个独特的心理变量的死亡率风险,同时还调整了其他心理变量和健康行为。基线调整包括年龄、性别、教育水平和现患疾病。
认知敌意与全因死亡率相关,与健康行为无关(在 6 到 30 的范围内,危险比 [HR] 为 1.05;95%置信区间 [95%CI]:1.01-1.09)。愤怒、攻击和叛逆与死亡率风险无关。
在降低过度死亡风险方面,敌对认知可能需要与不健康的生活方式所带来的风险分开并额外加以考虑。