Nabi Hermann, Consoli Silla M, Chiron Mireille, Lafont Sylviane, Chastang Jean François, Zins Marie, Lagarde Emmanuel
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, INSERM, U687, Saint-Maurice, F-94415 France.
Psychol Med. 2006 Mar;36(3):365-73. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006562. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
Aggressiveness on the roads and/or anger behind the wheel are considered to be a major traffic safety problem in several countries. However, the psychological mechanisms of anger and/or aggression on the roads remain largely unclear. This study examines a large cohort of French employees followed over the period 1994-2001 to establish whether psychometric measures of aggression/hostility were significantly associated with an increased risk of an injury accident (I-A). An I-A was defined as a traffic accident in which someone was injured, that is required medical care.
A total of 11,754 participants aged from 39 to 54 years in 1993 were included in this study. Aggression/hostility was measured in 1993 using the French version of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). Driving behaviors and I-A were recorded in 2001. Sociodemographic and alcohol consumption data were available from annual follow-up of the cohort. The relationship between aggression/hostility scores and I-A was assessed using negative binomial regression models with time-dependent covariates.
The overall BDHI scoring was not statistically predictive of subsequent I-A: adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.28, for participants with intermediate scores and aRR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.61 for those with high scores, both compared to those with low scores. The only BDHI subscales found to be associated with I-A were 'irritability' (aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.75 for participants with high scores) and 'negativism' (aRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.71 for participants with high scores).
Overall aggression/hostility personality traits did not predict I-A in this large cohort of French employees, suggesting that aggressiveness on the roads and/or anger behind the wheel extend beyond the individual's general propensity for aggression.
在一些国家,道路上的攻击性驾驶行为和/或驾车时的愤怒情绪被视为一个主要的交通安全问题。然而,道路上愤怒和/或攻击行为的心理机制在很大程度上仍不明确。本研究对一大群在1994年至2001年期间接受跟踪调查的法国员工进行了研究,以确定攻击性/敌意的心理测量指标是否与伤害事故(I-A)风险增加显著相关。I-A被定义为有人受伤且需要医疗护理的交通事故。
本研究纳入了1993年时年龄在39至54岁之间的11754名参与者。1993年使用法语版的布斯-杜克敌意量表(BDHI)测量攻击性/敌意。2001年记录驾驶行为和I-A情况。社会人口统计学和酒精消费数据可从该队列的年度随访中获得。使用具有时间依赖性协变量的负二项回归模型评估攻击性/敌意得分与I-A之间的关系。
BDHI总体得分对后续的I-A没有统计学上的预测性:中等得分参与者的调整率比(aRR)为1.02,95%置信区间(CI)为0.81-1.28;高得分参与者的aRR为1.25,95%CI为0.98-1.61,两者均与低得分参与者相比。发现与I-A相关的唯一BDHI子量表是“易怒性”(高得分参与者的aRR为1.33,95%CI为1.02-1.75)和“消极主义”(高得分参与者的aRR为1.32,95%CI为1.01-1.71)。
在这一大群法国员工中,总体攻击性/敌意人格特质并不能预测I-A,这表明道路上的攻击性驾驶行为和/或驾车时的愤怒情绪不仅仅取决于个人的一般攻击倾向。