• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体轻度创伤性脑损伤患者创伤性轴索损伤的稳健检测:个体间变异性、随时间变化和各向异性的双向变化。

Robust detection of traumatic axonal injury in individual mild traumatic brain injury patients: intersubject variation, change over time and bidirectional changes in anisotropy.

机构信息

The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

出版信息

Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Jun;6(2):329-42. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9175-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11682-012-9175-2
PMID:22684769
Abstract

To identify and characterize otherwise occult inter-individual spatial variation of white matter abnormalities across mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients. After informed consent and in compliance with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed on a 3.0 T MR scanner in 34 mTBI patients (19 women; 19-64 years old) and 30 healthy control subjects. The patients were imaged within 2 weeks of injury, 3 months after injury, and 6 months after injury. Fractional anisotropy (FA) images were analyzed in each patient. To examine white matter diffusion abnormalities across the entire brain of individual patients, we applied Enhanced Z-score Microstructural Assessment for Pathology (EZ-MAP), a voxelwise analysis optimized for the assessment of individual subjects. Our analysis revealed areas of abnormally low or high FA (voxel-wise P-value < 0.05, cluster-wise P-value < 0.01(corrected for multiple comparisons)). The spatial pattern of white matter FA abnormalities varied among patients. Areas of low FA were consistent with known patterns of traumatic axonal injury. Areas of high FA were most frequently detected in the deep and subcortical white matter of the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes, and in the anterior portions of the corpus callosum. The number of both abnormally low and high FA voxels changed during follow up. Individual subject assessments reveal unique spatial patterns of white matter abnormalities in each patient, attributable to inter-individual differences in anatomy, vulnerability to injury and mechanism of injury. Implications of high FA remain unclear, but may evidence a compensatory mechanism or plasticity in response to injury, rather than a direct manifestation of brain injury.

摘要

目的

识别和描述轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者之间存在的、否则难以察觉的白质异常的个体间空间变异性,并对其特征进行描述。

方法

在获得知情同意并符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的前提下,对 34 名 mTBI 患者(19 名女性;19-64 岁)和 30 名健康对照者在 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪上进行弥散张量成像(DTI)检查。患者在损伤后 2 周、3 个月和 6 个月进行成像。对每位患者的各向异性分数(FA)图像进行分析。为了在个体患者的整个大脑中检查白质弥散异常,我们应用了增强 Z 分数微观结构评估病理学(EZ-MAP),这是一种针对个体受试者评估进行优化的体素分析方法。我们的分析揭示了 FA 值异常降低或升高的区域(体素水平 P 值<0.05,簇水平 P 值<0.01(经多重比较校正))。FA 值异常的白质空间模式在患者之间存在差异。FA 值降低的区域与已知的创伤性轴索损伤模式一致。FA 值升高的区域最常出现在额、顶、颞叶的深部和皮质下白质以及胼胝体的前部。在随访过程中,FA 值异常降低和升高的体素数量发生了变化。个体受试者评估揭示了每个患者独特的白质异常空间模式,这归因于解剖学、易受伤性和损伤机制的个体间差异。FA 值升高的确切含义尚不清楚,但可能表明存在一种补偿机制或可塑性,以应对损伤,而不是脑损伤的直接表现。

相似文献

1
Robust detection of traumatic axonal injury in individual mild traumatic brain injury patients: intersubject variation, change over time and bidirectional changes in anisotropy.个体轻度创伤性脑损伤患者创伤性轴索损伤的稳健检测:个体间变异性、随时间变化和各向异性的双向变化。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Jun;6(2):329-42. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9175-2.
2
Multifocal white matter ultrastructural abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury with cognitive disability: a voxel-wise analysis of diffusion tensor imaging.轻度创伤性脑损伤伴认知障碍患者的多灶性白质超微结构异常:基于扩散张量成像的体素分析
J Neurotrauma. 2008 Nov;25(11):1335-42. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0547.
3
Diffusion tensor imaging during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury and relation to clinical outcome: a longitudinal study.重度创伤性脑损伤恢复过程中的弥散张量成像及其与临床结局的关系:一项纵向研究。
Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):559-72. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm294. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
4
Detection of hemorrhagic and axonal pathology in mild traumatic brain injury using advanced MRI: implications for neurorehabilitation.利用先进的 MRI 技术检测轻度创伤性脑损伤中的出血和轴索病变:对神经康复的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;31(3):261-79. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0795.
5
Diffusion-tensor imaging implicates prefrontal axonal injury in executive function impairment following very mild traumatic brain injury.扩散张量成像表明,在非常轻度的创伤性脑损伤后,前额叶轴突损伤与执行功能障碍有关。
Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):816-24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523081584. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
6
Whole brain approaches for identification of microstructural abnormalities in individual patients: comparison of techniques applied to mild traumatic brain injury.用于识别个体患者微观结构异常的全脑方法:应用于轻度创伤性脑损伤的技术比较。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059382. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
7
Diffusion tensor imaging in moderate-to-severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: changes within an 18 month post-injury interval.中重度儿童创伤性脑损伤的弥散张量成像:伤后 18 个月内的变化。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Sep;6(3):404-16. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9150-y.
8
White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study.慢性创伤性脑损伤中的白质完整性与认知:一项扩散张量成像研究
Brain. 2007 Oct;130(Pt 10):2508-19. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm216. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
9
Quantitative evaluation of microscopic injury with diffusion tensor imaging in a rat model of diffuse axonal injury.弥散张量成像评价弥漫性轴索损伤大鼠模型的微观损伤。
Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Mar;33(5):933-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07573.x.
10
White matter integrity and cognition in mild traumatic brain injury following motor vehicle accident.机动车事故后轻度创伤性脑损伤中的白质完整性与认知
Brain Res. 2014 Dec 3;1591:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.030. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Customized Neural Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Target for Functional Disability Among Veterans With Co-Occurring Alcohol Use Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.针对同时患有酒精使用障碍和轻度创伤性脑损伤的退伍军人功能残疾的定制神经经颅磁刺激靶点:一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 23;14:e64909. doi: 10.2196/64909.
2
Volumetric and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Abnormalities Are Associated With Behavioral Changes Post-Concussion in a Youth Pig Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.在轻度创伤性脑损伤的青年猪模型中,体积和扩散张量成像异常与脑震荡后的行为变化相关。
NMR Biomed. 2025 Jul;38(7):e70074. doi: 10.1002/nbm.70074.
3
Pain-Related White-Matter Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Pilot Study.
轻度创伤性脑损伤后与疼痛相关的白质变化:一项纵向扩散张量成像初步研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(5):642. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050642.
4
ANKS1B encoded AIDA-1 regulates social behaviors by controlling oligodendrocyte function.ANK1B 编码的 AIDA-1 通过控制少突胶质细胞功能调节社会行为。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 21;14(1):8499. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43438-1.
5
Diffusion in the corpus callosum predicts persistence of clinical symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury, a multi-scanner study.胼胝体中的扩散现象可预测轻度创伤性脑损伤后临床症状的持续情况:一项多扫描仪研究
Front Neuroimaging. 2023 Oct 31;2:1153115. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2023.1153115. eCollection 2023.
6
Concussion: Beyond the Cascade.脑震荡:超越级联反应。
Cells. 2023 Aug 22;12(17):2128. doi: 10.3390/cells12172128.
7
Spatiotemporal profile of atrophy in the first year following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后第一年的萎缩时空分布特征。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Sep;44(13):4692-4709. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26410. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging Findings the First Year following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.弥散张量和峰度成像研究在轻度创伤性脑损伤后的第一年发现。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Mar;40(5-6):457-471. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0206. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
White matter abnormalities characterize the acute stage of sports-related mild traumatic brain injury.白质异常是与运动相关的轻度创伤性脑损伤急性期的特征。
Brain Commun. 2022 Aug 17;4(4):fcac208. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac208. eCollection 2022.
10
Role of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Axonal Injury in Individual Patients with a Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mini-Review.扩散张量成像在个体脑震荡或轻度创伤性脑损伤患者创伤性轴索损伤诊断中的作用:一项小型综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;12(7):1580. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071580.