Slijper Angélique, Danielsson Anna, Willén Carin
Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Skaraborg Hospital, 54185 Skövde, Sweden.
Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:206495. doi: 10.1155/2012/206495. Epub 2012 May 17.
Objective. The aim was to compare walking with an individually designed dynamic hinged ankle foot orthosis (DAFO) and a standard carbon composite ankle foot orthosis (C-AFO). Methods. Twelve participants, mean age 56 years (range 26-72), with hemiparesis due to stroke were included in the study. During the six-minute walk test (6MW), walking velocity, the Physiological Cost Index (PCI), and the degree of experienced exertion were measured with a DAFO and C-AFO, respectively, followed by a Stairs Test velocity and perceived confidence was rated. Results. The mean differences in favor for the DAFO were in 6MW 24.3 m (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.90, 43.76), PCI -0.09 beats/m (95% CI -0.27, 0.95), velocity 0.04 m/s (95% CI -0.01, 0.097), and in the Stairs Test -11.8 s (95% CI -19.05, -4.48). All participants except one perceived the degree of experienced exertion lower and felt more confident when walking with the DAFO. Conclusions. Wearing a DAFO resulted in longer walking distance and faster stair climbing compared to walking with a C-AFO. Eleven of twelve participants felt more confident with the DAFO, which may be more important than speed and distance and the most important reason for prescribing an AFO.
目的。本研究旨在比较使用个性化设计的动态铰链式踝足矫形器(DAFO)与标准碳复合材料踝足矫形器(C-AFO)行走的情况。方法。本研究纳入了12名因中风导致偏瘫的参与者,平均年龄56岁(范围26 - 72岁)。在六分钟步行测试(6MW)期间,分别使用DAFO和C-AFO测量步行速度、生理成本指数(PCI)以及主观用力程度,随后进行楼梯测试并评估速度和主观信心。结果。与C-AFO相比,使用DAFO时,6MW的平均差异为多走24.3米(95%置信区间[CI] 4.90,43.76),PCI降低0.09次/米(95% CI -0.27,0.95),速度提高0.04米/秒(95% CI -0.01,0.097),楼梯测试时间缩短11.8秒(95% CI -19.05,-4.48)。除一名参与者外,所有参与者在使用DAFO行走时主观用力程度更低且感觉更自信。结论。与使用C-AFO行走相比,佩戴DAFO可使步行距离更长且爬楼梯速度更快。12名参与者中有11名对DAFO更有信心,这可能比速度和距离更重要,也是开具踝足矫形器的最重要原因。