• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院期间血管通路失败的管理所导致的住院时间延长及费用增加。

Increased length of stay and costs associated with inpatient management of vascular access failures.

作者信息

Sawant Abhishek, Mills Paul K, Dhingra Hemant

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Community Regional Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, California 93720, USA.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2012.01083.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2012.01083.x
PMID:22686456
Abstract

The creation and maintenance of vascular access for hemodialysis patients is responsible for a significant amount of morbidity and hospital expenses which continue to escalate with increasing population of ESRD patients. A retrospective review of patient charts were performed from 2008 to May 2011 at an academic tertiary care center who had a diagnosis of vascular access failure based on ICD 9 coding. Data regarding demographic information, length of stay (LOS), source of insurance, hospital expenses, and discharge status were obtained. Based on strict inclusion criteria we identified 172 total patients. The mean age among all patients was 60.53 ± 15.35 years and the majority of patients were Hispanic (n = 81). The Mean LOS was 5.30 ± 4.64 days. Mean hospital costs were 41,896 ± 20,318 US$. Patients admitted for tunneled dialysis placement had greater length of stay (p-value = 0.011) as did patients with hypertension (p-value = 0.030). Hospital expenses were significantly higher for patients admitted for arterio-venous fistula complications (55,456 ± 23,779 US$) compared with admissions for catheter or dialysis graft related complications (p-value = 0.004). Patients on Medicare had significantly lower length of stay (3.98 ± 3.32 days) compared with patients with Medicare/Medical (6.59 ± 5.69 days), p-value = 0.047. Inpatient management of vascular access failure is associated with increased length of stay, and significant hospital expenses. Timely referral to vascular access centers can prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and provide cost-saving benefits.

摘要

为血液透析患者建立和维护血管通路会导致大量发病情况和医院费用,随着终末期肾病(ESRD)患者数量的增加,这些费用持续攀升。在一所学术性三级医疗中心,对2008年至2011年5月期间根据国际疾病分类第九版(ICD 9)编码诊断为血管通路失败的患者病历进行了回顾性研究。获取了有关人口统计学信息、住院时间(LOS)、保险来源、医院费用和出院状态的数据。根据严格的纳入标准,共确定了172名患者。所有患者的平均年龄为60.53±15.35岁,大多数患者为西班牙裔(n = 81)。平均住院时间为5.30±4.64天。平均医院费用为41,896±20,318美元。因隧道式透析置管入院的患者住院时间更长(p值 = 0.011),高血压患者也是如此(p值 = 0.030)。与因导管或透析移植物相关并发症入院的患者相比,因动静脉内瘘并发症入院的患者医院费用显著更高(55,456±23,779美元)(p值 = 0.004)。与有医疗保险/医疗补助的患者(6.59±5.69天)相比,参加医疗保险的患者住院时间显著更短(3.98±3.32天),p值 = 0.047。血管通路失败的住院管理与住院时间延长和高额医院费用相关。及时转诊至血管通路中心可预防不必要的住院并节省成本。

相似文献

1
Increased length of stay and costs associated with inpatient management of vascular access failures.住院期间血管通路失败的管理所导致的住院时间延长及费用增加。
Semin Dial. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2012.01083.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
2
Hemodialysis access cost comparisons among incident tunneled catheter patients.初发带隧道导管患者的血液透析通路成本比较
J Vasc Access. 2020 May;21(3):308-313. doi: 10.1177/1129729819874307. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
The effect of diabetes mellitus on costs and length of stay in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing vascular surgery.糖尿病对接受血管手术的外周动脉疾病患者的费用及住院时间的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;48(4):447-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
4
Planned creation of vascular access saves medical expenses for incident dialysis patients.计划性血管通路建立可节省急诊透析患者的医疗费用。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009 Oct;25(10):521-9. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70544-3.
5
The management and outcome of occluded haemodialysis access: a retrospective audit.闭塞性血液透析通路的管理与转归:一项回顾性审计
N Z Med J. 2002 Nov 22;115(1166):U258.
6
Establishment and maintenance of vascular access in incident hemodialysis patients: a prospective cost analysis.初诊血液透析患者血管通路的建立与维护:一项前瞻性成本分析。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Jan;16(1):201-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004050355. Epub 2004 Nov 24.
7
Clinical and economic outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus septicemia in ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis.接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者金黄色葡萄球菌败血症的临床和经济结局
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Aug;46(2):301-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.04.019.
8
Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Rising Costs as a Surrogate Marker for Patency and Function of Arteriovenous Fistulas.血液透析血管通路:费用上升作为动静脉内瘘通畅性和功能的替代指标
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
9
Examining Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow catheter performance and cost in hemodialysis access.评估血液透析可靠流出导管在血液透析通路中的性能和成本。
J Surg Res. 2014 Nov;192(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
10
National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.子宫肌瘤手术住院费用和住院时长的全国趋势及影响因素。
J Health Care Finance. 2007 Spring;33(3):1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioprinting Vascularized Constructs for Clinical Relevance: Engineering Hydrogel Systems for Biological Maturity.用于临床相关性的生物打印血管化构建体:为实现生物学成熟而设计水凝胶系统
Gels. 2025 Aug 12;11(8):636. doi: 10.3390/gels11080636.
2
Salvage of thrombosed arteriovenous fistulae of patients on hemodialysis: report on the experience of a Brazilian center.血液透析患者血栓形成的动静脉内瘘挽救:巴西一家中心的经验报告。
J Bras Nefrol. 2018 Oct-Dec;40(4):351-359. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0036. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
3
Endovascular Stent Placement for Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Stenosis.
用于血液透析动静脉通路狭窄的血管内支架置入术
Int J Vasc Med. 2015;2015:971202. doi: 10.1155/2015/971202. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in dialysis access.透析通路中的动脉瘤和假性动脉瘤。
Clin Kidney J. 2015 Aug;8(4):363-7. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv042. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
5
Clinical Experience with a Hybrid Procedure Using the Adherent Clot Catheter for Salvage of Thrombosed Hemodialysis Access: A Comparison with the Standard Fogarty Balloon Catheter.使用粘附性血栓导管进行杂交手术挽救血栓形成的血液透析通路的临床经验:与标准Fogarty球囊导管的比较。
Vasc Specialist Int. 2015 Mar;31(1):25-31. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2015.31.1.25. Epub 2015 Mar 31.