a University of Regensburg , Germany.
Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):197-216. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000283.
Recent studies have shown that the basic evaluative conditioning (EC) effect (originally neutral stimuli acquiring an affective value congruent with the valence of the affective stimulus they were paired with) seems to be limited to participants who are unaware of the stimulus pairings. If participants are aware of the pairings, reactance effects occur (i.e., changes in the opposite direction of the valence of the affective stimulus). To examine whether these reactance effects are due to processes of conscious countercontrol or whether the ratings reflect intrinsic feelings towards the stimuli, a new procedure was developed that included a bogus-pipeline condition. In this procedure, which was adapted from attitude research, participants were connected to bogus lie detector equipment leading them to believe that their "true" affective-evaluative responses were being observed. In Experiment 1, reactance effects occurred also in this procedure, suggesting that the effect is spontaneous and not due to processes of conscious countercontrol. In Experiment 2, these effects were replicated using a between-subjects design in addition to the standard within-subjects control condition.
最近的研究表明,基本评价条件作用(EC)效应(最初的中性刺激获得与它们与之配对的情感刺激的效价一致的情感价值)似乎仅限于那些不知道刺激配对的参与者。如果参与者意识到配对,就会发生反应性效应(即,与情感刺激的效价相反的方向变化)。为了检验这些反应性效应是否是由于有意识的反向控制过程引起的,还是评分反映了对刺激的内在感受,开发了一种新的程序,其中包括了虚假管道条件。在这个程序中,从态度研究中改编而来,参与者被连接到虚假的测谎设备上,使他们相信他们的“真实”情感-评价反应正在被观察到。在实验 1 中,即使在这个程序中也出现了反应性效应,这表明该效应是自发的,而不是由于有意识的反向控制过程引起的。在实验 2 中,除了标准的内-被试控制条件外,还使用了被试间设计来复制这些效应。