Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Integr Comp Biol. 2012 Aug;52(2):274-80. doi: 10.1093/icb/ics085. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Three species of amphibious sea kraits (Laticauda spp.) spend variable time at sea and require fresh water for water balance. Both the rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss and the extent of terrestriality are known to differ among them. Laticauda semifasciata has the greatest rate of water loss and the least extent of terrestriality, whereas L. colubrina exhibits the reverse and L. laticaudata is intermediate. These sea kraits tend to be more abundant at places where there are sources of fresh water, but other factors also influence their distribution. To further clarify the habitat requirements, we investigated the abundance of each species of sea krait at six different habitats and the availability of each type of habitat on Orchid Island, Taiwan. The six habitats were high coral reef without fresh water (HR) and with fresh water (HRF); low coral reef without fresh water (LR) and with fresh water (LRF); sand or gravel coast, which has no coral reef, without fresh water (NR) and with fresh water (NRF). The extent of safety judged from the relative availability of retreat sites, from high to low, was HR, LR, and NR among these habitats. More than 75% of individuals counted for each species were found in HRF. We found no sea kraits in NRF and NR. The most available habitat was LR, but no L. laticaudata or L. semifasciata were found in this habitat. We found 3.3% and 16.7% of L. colubrina in LR and HR, respectively. For L. colubrina, the second abundant habitat was HR, whereas for L. laticaudata and L. semifasciata, the second abundant habitat was LRF. We conclude that both safety (availability of retreat sites) and fresh water are important to the habitat selection of sea kraits. Compared with other species, L. colubrina is characterized by a greater extent of terrestrial habit and possibly greater variety of access to sources of fresh water.
三种水陆两栖海蛇(Laticauda 属)在海上停留的时间不同,需要淡水来维持水平衡。它们的皮肤蒸发失水率和陆地活动程度都有所不同。Laticauda semifasciata 的失水率最高,陆地活动程度最低,而 L. colubrina 则相反,L. laticaudata 则处于中间水平。这些海蛇往往在有淡水来源的地方更为丰富,但其他因素也会影响它们的分布。为了进一步阐明其栖息地要求,我们调查了台湾兰屿六个不同栖息地的每个海蛇物种的丰度以及每个栖息地类型的可用性。这六个栖息地是没有淡水的高珊瑚礁(HR)和有淡水的高珊瑚礁(HRF);没有淡水的低珊瑚礁(LR)和有淡水的低珊瑚礁(LRF);没有珊瑚礁的沙或砾石岸,没有淡水(NR)和有淡水(NRF)。从撤退点的相对可用性判断,这些栖息地的安全性从高到低依次为 HR、LR 和 NR。超过 75%的个体出现在 HRF 中。我们在 NRF 和 NR 中没有发现海蛇。最易获得的栖息地是 LR,但在这个栖息地没有发现 L. laticaudata 或 L. semifasciata。我们在 LR 和 HR 中分别发现了 3.3%和 16.7%的 L. colubrina。对于 L. colubrina 来说,第二丰富的栖息地是 HR,而对于 L. laticaudata 和 L. semifasciata 来说,第二丰富的栖息地是 LRF。我们的结论是,安全(撤退点的可用性)和淡水对海蛇的栖息地选择都很重要。与其他物种相比,L. colubrina 的陆地习性更为明显,可能有更多的途径获得淡水来源。