Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Sep;135(2):335-46. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2121-6. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
The contribution of adjuvant taxanes (T) in cardiovascular toxicity, leukemic risk, and non-cancer-related deaths is unknown when they are added to anthracycline (A)-based chemotherapy for breast cancer. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the risk of cardiovascular toxicity, leukemia, neurotoxicity, and non-breast cancer-related mortality associated with T added to adjuvant A in breast cancer. PubMed was searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective RCTs in which approved T in combination with A (A + T) were compared with A alone as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Summary incidence rates, relative risks (RRs), and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated by means of fixed- or random-effects models. A total of 27,039 patients from 15 RCTs were included. Compared with A alone, A + T was associated with a statistically similar risk of toxicity. Compared with control arms, A + T schedules with less cumulative dose of anthracyclines than control arms were associated with lower severe cardiotoxicity (RR = 0.41, [95% CI 0.26-0.66], P = 0.0002), venous thromboembolic events (RR 0.45, [95% CI 0.26-0.79], P = 0.006), and leukemic risk (RR 0.39; [95%CI 0.18-0.87] P = 0.02), but with an increased risk of non-breast cancer-related mortality (RR = 1.79, [95% CI 1.06-3.04] P = 0.03). In particular, this risk of death is greater when >3 cycles of A precede T in sequential schedules (RR 2.24, [1.2-4.21] P = 0.01). This meta-analysis suggests that A + T-based adjuvant chemotherapy is as toxic as A alone with no significant difference in non-breast cancer-related mortality. However, sequential A + T schedules are associated with less toxicity, but a significant increase in non-breast cancer-related mortality compared with control arms with a greater dose of A.
当紫杉烷(T)类药物与蒽环类药物(A)联合用于乳腺癌的辅助化疗时,其在心血管毒性、白血病风险和非癌症相关死亡方面的贡献尚不清楚。我们对已发表的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,以确定 T 类药物在乳腺癌的辅助 A 中的添加与心血管毒性、白血病、神经毒性和非乳腺癌相关死亡率之间的关联。我们在 PubMed 上搜索了相关研究。合格的研究包括前瞻性 RCT,其中批准的 T 类药物联合 A(A+T)与 A 类药物单独用于乳腺癌的辅助化疗进行比较。通过固定或随机效应模型计算了汇总发生率、相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间。共纳入了来自 15 项 RCT 的 27039 名患者。与 A 类药物单独治疗相比,A+T 类药物治疗的毒性发生率无统计学差异。与对照组相比,蒽环类药物累积剂量低于对照组的 A+T 方案与严重心脏毒性(RR = 0.41,95%CI 0.26-0.66,P = 0.0002)、静脉血栓栓塞事件(RR = 0.45,95%CI 0.26-0.79,P = 0.006)和白血病风险(RR = 0.39,95%CI 0.18-0.87,P = 0.02)降低相关,但与非乳腺癌相关死亡率升高(RR = 1.79,95%CI 1.06-3.04,P = 0.03)相关。特别是,在序贯方案中,A 类药物治疗超过 3 个周期后,这种死亡风险更大(RR 2.24,95%CI 1.2-4.21,P = 0.01)。本荟萃分析表明,A+T 类药物辅助化疗与 A 类药物单独治疗一样具有毒性,非乳腺癌相关死亡率无显著差异。然而,与剂量较大的 A 类药物对照臂相比,序贯 A+T 方案的毒性较小,但非乳腺癌相关死亡率显著增加。