Butler Hospital/Brown Department of Psychiatry, 345 Blackstone Boulevard, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Jul;29(7):587-96. doi: 10.1002/da.21969. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in real-world clinical practice settings. METHODS: Forty-two US-based clinical TMS practice sites treated 307 outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and persistent symptoms despite antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Treatment was based on the labeled procedures of the approved TMS device. Assessments were performed at baseline, week 2, at the point of maximal acute benefit, and at week 6 when the acute course extended beyond 6 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the Clinician Global Impressions-Severity of Illness from baseline to end of acute phase. Secondary outcomes were change in continuous and categorical outcomes on self-report depression scales (9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], and Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report [IDS-SR]). RESULTS: Patients had a mean ± SD age of 48.6 ± 14.2 years and 66.8% were female. Patients received an average of 2.5 (± 2.4) antidepressant treatments of adequate dose and duration without satisfactory improvement in this episode. There was a significant change in CGI-S from baseline to end of treatment (-1.9 ± 1.4, P < .0001). Clinician-assessed response rate (CGI-S) was 58.0% and remission rate was 37.1%. Patient-reported response rate ranged from 56.4 to 41.5% and remission rate ranged from 28.7 to 26.5%, (PHQ-9 and IDS-SR, respectively). CONCLUSION: Outcomes demonstrated response and adherence rates similar to research populations. These data indicate that TMS is an effective treatment for those unable to benefit from initial antidepressant medication.
背景: 很少有研究考察经颅磁刺激(TMS)在真实临床环境中的有效性。
方法: 42 个美国临床 TMS 实践点治疗了 307 名患有重度抑郁症(MDD)且对抗抑郁药物治疗持续存在症状的门诊患者。治疗基于已批准的 TMS 设备的标签程序。在基线、第 2 周、最大急性获益时以及急性期延长至 6 周以上的第 6 周进行评估。主要结果是从基线到急性阶段结束时临床医生总体印象严重程度的变化。次要结果是自我报告抑郁量表(9 项患者健康问卷 [PHQ-9]和抑郁症状自评量表 [IDS-SR])的连续和分类结果的变化。
结果: 患者的平均年龄 ± 标准差为 48.6 ± 14.2 岁,66.8%为女性。患者接受了平均 2.5(±2.4)种充分剂量和持续时间的抗抑郁治疗,但在此发作中没有明显改善。从基线到治疗结束时,CGI-S 有显著变化(-1.9 ± 1.4,P <.0001)。临床医生评估的反应率(CGI-S)为 58.0%,缓解率为 37.1%。患者报告的反应率范围为 56.4%至 41.5%,缓解率范围为 28.7%至 26.5%(分别为 PHQ-9 和 IDS-SR)。
结论: 结果表明,TMS 的反应率和依从率与研究人群相似。这些数据表明,对于那些无法从初始抗抑郁药物治疗中获益的患者,TMS 是一种有效的治疗方法。
J Affect Disord. 2018-4-25
Am J Psychiatry. 2025-6-1
J Neurosci. 2025-3-12