• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬皮病最佳实践:加拿大硬皮病研究组(CSRG)内 SSc 中心实践差异分析。

Best practices in scleroderma: an analysis of practice variability in SSc centres within the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG).

机构信息

University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2 Suppl 71):S38-43. Epub 2012 May 29.

PMID:22691207
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is currently no consensus on best practice in systemic sclerosis (SSc). To determine if variability in treatment and investigations exists, practices among Canadian Sclerodermia Research Group (CSRG) centres were compared.

METHODS

Prospective clinical and demographic data from adult SSc patients are collected annually from 15 CSRG treatment centres. Laboratory parameters, self-reported socio-demographic questionnaires, current and past medications and disease outcome measures are recorded. For centres with >50 patients enrolled, treatment practices were analysed to determine practice variability.

RESULTS

Data from 640 of 938 patients within the CSRG database met inclusion criteria, where 87.3% were female, the mean ± SEM age was 55.3±0.5, 48.9% had limited SSc and 47.8% had diffuse SSc (and 3.3% uncharacterised). Some investigation and treatment practices were inconsistent among 6 centres including proportion receiving: PDE5 (phosphodiesterase type 5) inhibitors for Raynaud's phenomenon (p=0.036); cyclophosphamide (p=0.037) and azathioprine (p=0.037) for treatment of ILD; and current use of D-penicillamine, although uncommon, varied among sites. Annual echocardiograms and PFTs were frequently done and did not vary among sites but the rate of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was directly related to site size and this was not the case for other organ involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite routine tests within a database, site variation in SSc with respect to investigations and management among CSRG centres exists suggesting a need for a standardised approach to the investigation and treatment of SSc. One can speculate that larger centres are more export in detecting PAH.

摘要

目的

目前对于硬皮病(SSc)尚无最佳治疗共识。为了确定治疗和检查是否存在差异,我们比较了加拿大硬皮病研究组(CSRG)中心的实践。

方法

每年从 15 个 CSRG 治疗中心收集成人 SSc 患者的前瞻性临床和人口统计学数据。记录实验室参数、自我报告的社会人口学问卷、当前和过去的药物以及疾病结局指标。对于纳入患者超过 50 人的中心,分析治疗实践以确定实践差异。

结果

CSRG 数据库中符合纳入标准的 640 名患者中,87.3%为女性,平均年龄±SEM 为 55.3±0.5 岁,48.9%为局限型 SSc,47.8%为弥漫型 SSc(3.3%为未定型)。6 个中心中,一些检查和治疗方法存在差异,包括接受磷酸二酯酶 5 型(PDE5)抑制剂治疗雷诺现象的比例(p=0.036);接受环磷酰胺(p=0.037)和硫唑嘌呤(p=0.037)治疗ILD 的比例;以及目前使用青霉胺的比例,尽管不太常见,但各中心之间存在差异。每年进行的超声心动图和 PFT 检查较为频繁,但各中心之间没有差异,但肺动脉高压(PAH)的发生率与中心规模直接相关,而其他器官受累则并非如此。

结论

尽管在数据库中进行了常规检查,但 CSRG 中心的 SSc 在检查和管理方面存在差异,这表明需要对 SSc 的检查和治疗采用标准化方法。可以推测,较大的中心更善于检测 PAH。

相似文献

1
Best practices in scleroderma: an analysis of practice variability in SSc centres within the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG).硬皮病最佳实践:加拿大硬皮病研究组(CSRG)内 SSc 中心实践差异分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2 Suppl 71):S38-43. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
A comparison between general rheumatologists and scleroderma experts with respect to following systemic sclerosis guidelines.普通风湿病学家与硬皮病专家在遵循系统性硬化症指南方面的比较。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Jul-Aug;33(4 Suppl 91):S40-6. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Agreement with guidelines from a large database for management of systemic sclerosis: results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group.与大型数据库中系统性硬化症管理指南一致:来自加拿大硬皮病研究组的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2012 Mar;39(3):524-31. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110121. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
4
Orthopaedic healthcare worldwide: standardized clinical assessment and management plans: an adjunct to clinical practice guidelines.全球骨科医疗保健:标准化临床评估与管理计划:临床实践指南的辅助工具
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1868-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4060-5. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
A Delphi exercise and cluster analysis to aid in the development of potential classification criteria for systemic sclerosis using SSc experts and databases.德尔菲法和聚类分析辅助系统性硬化症专家和数据库制定潜在分类标准。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Mar-Apr;31(2 Suppl 76):24-30. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
6
Myopathy is a poor prognostic feature in systemic sclerosis: results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) cohort.肌病是系统性硬化症的不良预后特征:来自加拿大硬皮病研究组(CSRG)队列的研究结果。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(3):217-20. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2013.868512. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
Changing Current Practice in Urology: Improving Guideline Development and Implementation Through Stakeholder Engagement.改变泌尿外科现状:通过利益相关者的参与来改进指南的制定和实施。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):161-163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Clinical risk assessment of organ manifestations in systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research group database.系统性硬化症器官表现的临床风险评估:来自欧洲抗风湿病联盟硬皮病试验与研究组数据库的报告
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jun;66(6):754-63. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062901. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
9
The Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort: baseline clinical features and comparison with other large scleroderma cohorts.硬皮病患者为中心干预网络队列:基线临床特征,并与其他大型硬皮病队列比较。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Sep 1;57(9):1623-1631. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key139.
10
Association of C-reactive protein with high disease activity in systemic sclerosis: results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group.C 反应蛋白与系统性硬化症高疾病活动度的相关性:来自加拿大硬皮病研究组的研究结果。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Sep;64(9):1405-14. doi: 10.1002/acr.21716.

引用本文的文献

1
Rheumatologists' Adherence to EULAR Recommendations for Systemic Sclerosis Treatment: Experience of a Single Center in Serbia.风湿病学家对欧洲抗风湿病联盟系统性硬化症治疗建议的依从性:塞尔维亚一个单中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):4994. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144994.
2
Quality Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.系统性硬化症的质量指标
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;13(4):579. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040579.
3
Pharmacological treatment for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung involvement: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
结缔组织病相关间质性肺疾病的药物治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析概述的方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0272327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272327. eCollection 2022.
4
Immunosuppression use in early systemic sclerosis may be increasing over time.随着时间的推移,早期系统性硬化症中免疫抑制药物的使用可能在增加。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2022 Feb;7(1):33-41. doi: 10.1177/23971983211000971. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
What moves the rheumatologist? Unravelling decision making in the referral of systemic sclerosis patients to health professionals: a qualitative study.是什么促使风湿病专家做出行动?解析系统性硬化症患者转诊给医疗专业人员过程中的决策制定:一项定性研究。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2018 Aug 22;2(2):rky027. doi: 10.1093/rap/rky027. eCollection 2018.
6
Optimal care for systemic sclerosis patients: recommendations from a patient-centered and multidisciplinary mixed-method study and working conference.系统性硬化症患者的最佳护理:一项以患者为中心的多学科混合方法研究和工作会议的建议。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;38(4):1007-1015. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4358-x. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
7
The patient experience of Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis.系统性硬皮病患者的雷诺现象体验。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;58(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key026.
8
The heterogeneity of clinical practice patterns among an international cohort of pulmonary arterial hypertension experts.一组国际肺动脉高压专家临床实践模式的异质性
Pulm Circ. 2014 Sep;4(3):441-51. doi: 10.1086/677357.
9
Prevalence and factors associated with glucocorticoids (GC) use in systemic sclerosis (SSc): a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and registries.系统性硬化症(SSc)中糖皮质激素(GC)使用的患病率及相关因素:队列研究和登记处的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;33(2):153-64. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2422-0. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
10
Treatment of early diffuse systemic sclerosis skin disease.早期弥漫性系统性硬皮病皮肤疾病的治疗。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Mar-Apr;31(2 Suppl 76):166-71. Epub 2013 Jul 23.