Cerný K
Institute for History of Medicine and Foreign Languages, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Prague Med Rep. 2012;113(2):119-35. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2015.27.
The paper deals with the problem of early modern scientific citations. It attempts to establish a measure of scientific popularity in a specific area of the academic medicine in a way which resembles a modern evaluation of scientific activity (citation index). For this purpose an analysis of a series of plague treatises written between 1480 and 1725 in Europe was conducted. Citations for various historical medical authorities (Hippocrates, Galen, etc.) are given in Tables which reflect a long time development of popularity. The authorities from various groups (Ancient, Medieval, Arabic, Early Modern) are linked together, and "generic authorities" are explained and discussed.
本文探讨了近代早期科学引用的问题。它试图以类似于现代科学活动评估(引用指数)的方式,建立一种衡量学术医学特定领域科学受欢迎程度的方法。为此,对1480年至1725年间欧洲撰写的一系列鼠疫论文进行了分析。表格中给出了对各种历史医学权威(希波克拉底、盖伦等)的引用,这些表格反映了受欢迎程度的长期发展。不同群体(古代、中世纪、阿拉伯、近代早期)的权威被联系在一起,并对“一般权威”进行了解释和讨论。