Manchester United Football Club, Trafford Training Center, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Apr;27(4):938-43. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182610b7d.
The use of sports-specific technical practices as a physical training stimulus has increased in recent years in soccer. Such approaches, although effective, can produce different levels of physiological strain in the individual players within the session, thereby limiting the usefulness of the training session for all players. The aim of this study was to develop a high-intensity soccer-specific training (SST) drill that was not only based on the demands of match-play but also would reduce the variability in the physiological response to training compared with other specific drills. To evaluate this approach to training, the SST drill was compared with a "traditional" aerobic interval training (AIT) protocol and a small-sided games (SSG) drill. Each training protocol was carried out across 4 × 4-minute exercise bouts, interspersed by 4 × 3 minutes of active recovery. Mean ± SD heart rates (HRs) for the 4-minute exercise bouts during SST (175 ± 5 b·min) and AIT (174 ± 6 b·min) were significantly higher than that observed during the SSG protocol (170 ± 6 b·min; p < 0.05). Heart rate during the SST drill showed less interparticipant variability (mean ± SD HR ranged from 169 ± 6 to 180 ± 5 b·min) when compared with those during AIT (157 ± 8 to 186 ± 8 b·min) and SSG (143 ± 10 to 179 ± 78 b·min) training conditions. Ratings of perceived exertion (SST, 6 ± 2; AIT, 7 ± 1; SSG, 5 ± 1) across the entire exercise period were similar between the 3 training conditions (p > 0.05). These results indicate that the SST stimulates a more uniform physiological response than other currently adopted specific endurance training protocols used in soccer. This would suggest that it provides a valid alternative to the current approaches used for the aerobic training of players.
近年来,在足球中,将专项技术练习作为一种身体训练刺激的方法已经越来越普遍。尽管这些方法很有效,但在训练过程中,它们会在个体运动员之间产生不同程度的生理压力,从而限制了所有运动员对训练的受益程度。本研究旨在开发一种高强度的足球专项训练(SST)练习,这种练习不仅基于比赛的需求,而且还可以减少与其他专项练习相比训练过程中生理反应的可变性。为了评估这种训练方法,SST 练习与传统的有氧间隔训练(AIT)方案和小场比赛(SSG)练习进行了比较。每个训练方案在 4×4 分钟的运动回合中进行,其间穿插 4×3 分钟的主动恢复。SST(175±5 b·min)和 AIT(174±6 b·min)中 4 分钟运动回合的平均±SD 心率(HR)显著高于 SSG 方案(170±6 b·min;p<0.05)。与 AIT(157±8 至 186±8 b·min)和 SSG(143±10 至 179±78 b·min)训练条件相比,SST 训练中的心率显示出较小的个体间变异性(平均±SD HR 范围为 169±6 至 180±5 b·min)。整个运动期间,3 种训练条件的感觉用力程度(SST,6±2;AIT,7±1;SSG,5±1)相似(p>0.05)。这些结果表明,SST 刺激的生理反应比足球中目前采用的其他专项耐力训练方案更均匀。这表明它为目前用于球员有氧训练的方法提供了一种有效的替代方案。