Suppr超能文献

在英国,使用额外的诊断测试来更好地选择适合静脉溶栓治疗的脑卒中患者的经济影响。

Economic impact of using additional diagnostic tests to better select patients with stroke for intravenous thrombolysis in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

RTI Health Solutions, 200 Park Offices Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2012 Jul;34(7):1544-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eligibility for thrombolysis as an acute stroke treatment is determined through the use of unenhanced noncontrast computed tomography (CT), time since stroke onset, and patient history. Assessing penumbral patterns, which can be examined only through the use of diagnostic technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and perfusion CT (CTP), may be able to better select patients for thrombolysis. However, trade-offs in terms of administration time and cost may affect the value of using these diagnostic studies.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the trade-offs among patient selection via usual care with CT, usual care plus MRI using diffusion-weighted and perfusion imaging, and usual care plus CTP for their effect on costs and outcomes when diagnosing stroke and selecting candidates for thrombolysis in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed. Efficacy and utilities were obtained from published studies. Costs were obtained from standard UK costing sources and were supplemented with data from the published literature. Outcomes included a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score <2), costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

Compared with usual care selection, adding CTP or MRI to better select patients for thrombolysis reduced the number of patients receiving thrombolysis by 9 and 14.6 per 1000 patients treated, respectively, while improving favorable outcome (19.2 and 17.6 per 1000 patients treated, respectively). In both scenarios, costs were decreased slightly. Both CTP and MRI selection were cost saving (more efficacious and less costly) compared with unenhanced CT selection; CTP selection was found to dominate MRI selection.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding diagnostic tests such as CTP and MRI to select UK patients for thrombolysis may be a good value for the money and may improve patient outcomes. If a preferred diagnostic test had to be chosen based on economic value, CTP might be the best compromise between unenhanced CT selection and MRI selection.

摘要

背景

通过使用未增强的非对比计算机断层扫描(CT)、中风发病时间和患者病史来确定急性中风溶栓治疗的资格。评估缺血半暗带模式(仅可通过磁共振成像(MRI)和灌注 CT(CTP)等诊断技术进行检查),可能能够更好地选择溶栓治疗的患者。然而,在管理时间和成本方面存在权衡取舍,可能会影响使用这些诊断研究的价值。

目的

我们检查了通过 CT 进行常规护理、通过 MRI 加弥散加权和灌注成像进行常规护理、以及通过 CTP 进行常规护理来选择患者对英国诊断中风和选择溶栓候选者的成本和结果的影响。

方法

开发了决策分析模型。从已发表的研究中获得了疗效和效用。从英国标准成本来源获得了成本,并补充了已发表文献中的数据。结果包括良好的结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分<2)、成本、生命年、质量调整生命年和增量成本效益比。

结果

与常规护理选择相比,添加 CTP 或 MRI 以更好地选择溶栓患者,使接受溶栓治疗的患者数量分别减少了 9 人和 14.6 人/1000 人治疗,同时改善了良好的结局(分别为 19.2 人和 17.6 人/1000 人治疗)。在这两种情况下,成本都略有下降。与未增强 CT 选择相比,CTP 和 MRI 选择均具有成本效益(更有效且成本更低);与 MRI 选择相比,CTP 选择具有优势。

结论

在英国患者中添加 CTP 和 MRI 等诊断测试以选择接受溶栓治疗的患者,可能是一种物有所值的方法,并且可能改善患者的结局。如果必须根据经济价值选择首选的诊断测试,那么 CTP 可能是在未增强 CT 选择和 MRI 选择之间的最佳折衷方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验