Suppr超能文献

人类工具使用的认知基础。

The cognitive bases of human tool use.

机构信息

Philosophy & Ethics, School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Aug;35(4):203-18. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001452. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

Abstract

This article has two goals. The first is to assess, in the face of accruing reports on the ingenuity of great ape tool use, whether and in what sense human tool use still evidences unique, higher cognitive ability. To that effect, I offer a systematic comparison between humans and nonhuman primates with respect to nine cognitive capacities deemed crucial to tool use: enhanced hand-eye coordination, body schema plasticity, causal reasoning, function representation, executive control, social learning, teaching, social intelligence, and language. Since striking differences between humans and great apes stand firm in eight out of nine of these domains, I conclude that human tool use still marks a major cognitive discontinuity between us and our closest relatives. As a second goal of the paper, I address the evolution of human technologies. In particular, I show how the cognitive traits reviewed help to explain why technological accumulation evolved so markedly in humans, and so modestly in apes.

摘要

本文有两个目标。第一个是评估,面对越来越多关于大型猿类工具使用的创造性的报告,人类的工具使用是否以及在何种意义上仍然表现出独特的、更高的认知能力。为此,我从九个被认为对工具使用至关重要的认知能力方面,对人类和非人类灵长类动物进行了系统比较:增强的手眼协调能力、身体图式的可塑性、因果推理、功能表示、执行控制、社会学习、教学、社会智力和语言。由于在这九个领域中的八个领域,人类和大型猿类之间存在显著差异,因此我得出结论,人类的工具使用仍然标志着我们与近亲之间的主要认知差异。本文的第二个目标是探讨人类技术的进化。特别是,我展示了这些被审查的认知特征如何帮助解释为什么技术积累在人类中如此显著地进化,而在猿类中却如此温和。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验