Suppr超能文献

人类工具使用的认知基础。

The cognitive bases of human tool use.

机构信息

Philosophy & Ethics, School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Aug;35(4):203-18. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001452. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

Abstract

This article has two goals. The first is to assess, in the face of accruing reports on the ingenuity of great ape tool use, whether and in what sense human tool use still evidences unique, higher cognitive ability. To that effect, I offer a systematic comparison between humans and nonhuman primates with respect to nine cognitive capacities deemed crucial to tool use: enhanced hand-eye coordination, body schema plasticity, causal reasoning, function representation, executive control, social learning, teaching, social intelligence, and language. Since striking differences between humans and great apes stand firm in eight out of nine of these domains, I conclude that human tool use still marks a major cognitive discontinuity between us and our closest relatives. As a second goal of the paper, I address the evolution of human technologies. In particular, I show how the cognitive traits reviewed help to explain why technological accumulation evolved so markedly in humans, and so modestly in apes.

摘要

本文有两个目标。第一个是评估,面对越来越多关于大型猿类工具使用的创造性的报告,人类的工具使用是否以及在何种意义上仍然表现出独特的、更高的认知能力。为此,我从九个被认为对工具使用至关重要的认知能力方面,对人类和非人类灵长类动物进行了系统比较:增强的手眼协调能力、身体图式的可塑性、因果推理、功能表示、执行控制、社会学习、教学、社会智力和语言。由于在这九个领域中的八个领域,人类和大型猿类之间存在显著差异,因此我得出结论,人类的工具使用仍然标志着我们与近亲之间的主要认知差异。本文的第二个目标是探讨人类技术的进化。特别是,我展示了这些被审查的认知特征如何帮助解释为什么技术积累在人类中如此显著地进化,而在猿类中却如此温和。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验