Department General Practice, University Medical Centre Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 9;13:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-56.
Elderly patients with multimorbidity who are treated according to guidelines use a large number of drugs. This number of drugs increases the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Stopping medication may relieve these effects, and thereby improve the patient's wellbeing. To facilitate management of polypharmacy expert-driven instruments have been developed, sofar with little effect on the patient's quality of life. Recently, much attention has been paid to shared decision-making in general practice, mainly focusing on patient preferences. This study explores how experienced GPs feel about deprescribing medication in older patients with multimorbidity and to what extent they involve patients in these decisions.
Focusgroups of GPs were used to develop a conceptual framework for understanding and categorizing the GP's view on the subject. Audiotapes were transcribed verbatim and studied by the first and second author. They selected independently relevant textfragments. In a next step they labeled these fragments and sorted them. From these labelled and sorted fragments central themes were extracted.
GPs discern symptomatic medication and preventive medication; deprescribing the latter category is seen as more difficult by the GPs due to lack of benefit/risk information for these patients.Factors influencing GPs'deprescribing were beliefs concerning patients (patients have no problem with polypharmacy; patients may interpret a proposal to stop preventive medication as a sign of having been given up on; and confronting the patient with a discussion of life expectancy vs quality of life is 'not done'), guidelines for treatment (GPs feel compelled to prescribe by the present guidelines) and organization of healthcare (collaboration with prescribing medical specialists and dispensing pharmacists.
The GPs' beliefs concerning elderly patients are a barrier to explore patient preferences when reviewing preventive medication. GPs would welcome decision support when dealing with several guidelines for one patient. Explicit rules for collaborating with medical specialists in this field are required. Training in shared decision making could help GPs to elicit patient preferences.
患有多种疾病的老年患者根据指南进行治疗会使用大量药物。药物数量的增加会增加不良药物事件(ADE)的风险。停止用药可能会缓解这些影响,从而改善患者的健康状况。为了便于管理多种药物,已经开发出了专家驱动的工具,但对患者的生活质量影响不大。最近,全科医生在一般实践中对共同决策给予了极大关注,主要关注患者的偏好。本研究探讨了经验丰富的全科医生如何看待患有多种疾病的老年患者减少用药,并在多大程度上让患者参与这些决策。
使用全科医生焦点小组来制定一个概念框架,以了解和分类全科医生对该主题的看法。对录音带进行逐字转录,并由第一和第二作者进行研究。他们独立选择相关的文本片段。在下一步中,他们对这些片段进行标记和分类。从这些标记和分类的片段中提取了核心主题。
全科医生区分了对症药物和预防药物;由于缺乏针对这些患者的获益/风险信息,全科医生认为减少后一类药物更为困难。影响全科医生减少用药的因素包括对患者的信念(患者对多种药物治疗没有问题;患者可能会将停止预防用药的建议解释为被放弃的迹象;与患者讨论预期寿命与生活质量相比,“不做”)、治疗指南(全科医生觉得必须按照目前的指南开处方)和医疗保健组织(与开处方的医学专家和发药药剂师合作)。
全科医生对老年患者的信念是在审查预防药物时探索患者偏好的障碍。全科医生在处理一名患者的多项指南时,将欢迎决策支持。需要制定明确的规则,与该领域的医学专家合作。共享决策制定的培训可以帮助全科医生了解患者的偏好。