Section of Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.123. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
The R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior) and centrality index nephrometry scores enable systematic, objective assessment of anatomical tumor features. We systematically compared these systems using item analysis test theory to optimize scoring methodology.
Analysis was based on 299 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from 2007 to 2011 and met study inclusion criteria. Percent functional volume preservation, and R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scores were measured. Late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation was calculated as the ratio of the late to the preoperative rate. Interobserver variability analysis was done to assess measurement error. All data were statistically analyzed.
A novel scoring method termed DAP (diameter-axial-polar) nephrometry was devised using a data based approach. Mean R.E.N.A.L., centrality index and DAP scores for the cohort were 7.3, 2.5 and 6 with 84%, 90% and 95% interobserver agreement, respectively. The DAP sum score and all individual DAP scoring components were associated with the clinical outcome, including percent functional volume preservation, warm ischemia time and operative blood loss. DAP scoring criteria allowed for the normalization of score distributions and increased discriminatory power. DAP scores showed strong linear associations with percent functional volume preservation (r(2) = 0.97) and late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation (r(2) = 0.81). Each 1 unit change in DAP score equated to an average 4% change in kidney volume.
DAP nephrometry integrates the optimized attributes of the R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems. DAP scoring was associated with simplified methodology, decreased measurement error, improved performance characteristics, improved interpretability and a clear association with volume loss and late function after partial nephrectomy.
RENA.L.(半径、外生性/内生性特征、肿瘤与集合系统或窦腔的接近程度、前后)和中心性指数肾单位切除术评分可对解剖肿瘤特征进行系统、客观的评估。我们使用项目分析测试理论对这些系统进行了系统比较,以优化评分方法。
分析基于 2007 年至 2011 年间接受部分肾切除术且符合研究纳入标准的 299 名患者。测量了功能体积保留百分比、RENA.L.和中心性指数评分。通过将术后与术前的比率计算,得出晚期肾小球滤过率保留的百分比。进行了观察者间变异性分析以评估测量误差。对所有数据进行了统计学分析。
使用基于数据的方法设计了一种新的评分方法,称为 DAP(直径-轴向-极向)肾单位切除术。该队列的平均 RENA.L.、中心性指数和 DAP 评分为 7.3、2.5 和 6,观察者间一致性分别为 84%、90%和 95%。DAP 总分和所有单独的 DAP 评分成分均与临床结果相关,包括功能体积保留百分比、热缺血时间和手术失血量。DAP 评分标准允许对评分分布进行归一化并提高判别能力。DAP 评分与功能体积保留百分比(r²=0.97)和晚期肾小球滤过率保留百分比(r²=0.81)呈强线性关联。DAP 评分每增加 1 个单位,平均肾脏体积变化 4%。
DAP 肾单位切除术整合了 RENA.L.和中心性指数评分系统的优化属性。DAP 评分与简化的方法学、减少的测量误差、改善的性能特征、改善的可解释性以及与部分肾切除术后体积损失和晚期功能的明确关联相关。