Suppr超能文献

双能 X 射线吸收法测量脂肪组织:3 种不同扇束仪器的交叉校准。

Fat tissue measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of 3 different fan-beam instruments.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mineral Metabolism Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2013 Apr-Jun;16(2):212-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

Abstract

Analysis of total tissue composition and, particularly, body fat measurements has become progressively important in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with different clinical conditions. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fan-beam scanners are widely used to measure body composition, but the development of translational equations to be able to compare data of different scanning systems is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of agreement for regional measurements of body composition among the following 3 fan-beam DXA scanners: (1) Hologic Discovery (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA), (2) Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI), and (3) Lunar Prodigy Advance (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI). The study population consisted of 91 adult healthy volunteers (40 males and 51 females; mean age 48.5±14.4yr) who underwent DXA evaluation of the lumbar spine, hip, and whole body in each machine on the same day. Agreement among the 3 scanners was evaluated according to the Bland-Altman method and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Results showed a better agreement and concordance for the Lunar iDXA scanner than for any of them with the Hologic scanner. Differences were higher for any tissue or region than for the whole tissue mass. Translational equations were developed to ensure comparability of body composition measurements obtained with each of these 3 scanners.

摘要

分析组织总量,特别是体脂测量,在不同临床情况下的患者诊断和随访中变得越来越重要。双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)扇形束扫描仪广泛用于测量身体成分,但需要开发转换方程来比较不同扫描系统的数据。本研究旨在评估以下 3 种扇形束 DXA 扫描仪在身体成分的区域测量方面的一致性程度:(1)Hologic Discovery(Hologic,Inc.,马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆),(2)Lunar iDXA(GE Healthcare,威斯康星州麦迪逊),和(3)Lunar Prodigy Advance(GE Healthcare,威斯康星州麦迪逊)。研究人群包括 91 名成年健康志愿者(40 名男性和 51 名女性;平均年龄 48.5±14.4 岁),他们在同一天的每台机器上进行了腰椎、臀部和全身的 DXA 评估。根据 Bland-Altman 方法和 Lin 的一致性相关系数评估了 3 台扫描仪之间的一致性。结果表明,Lunar iDXA 扫描仪的一致性和相关性均优于 Hologic 扫描仪。任何组织或区域的差异均高于整个组织质量的差异。为确保这 3 种扫描仪获得的身体成分测量值具有可比性,制定了转换方程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验