Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, Ankara, 06018, Turkey.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Nov;269(11):2433-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2078-4. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
One of the criticized aspects of surgeries for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is postoperative pain. We performed a study to compare the severity of pain occurring after different surgical techniques and to determine analgesic requirements in the first postoperative 24 h. Forty-eight patients with primary snoring or OSA who underwent anterior palatoplasty (AP), lateral pharyngoplasty (LP) or tongue base suspension suture (TBS) were included in this study. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for measuring pain intensity. Tramadol with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and when necessary rescue pethidine was used for pain relief. VAS pain scores, total PCA-tramadol consumptions and requirement of rescue analgesic in AP, LP and TBS groups were compared. Pain scores in TBS group were higher than AP group in all of the study time points except at 12th hour and LP group until the 10th hour. When compared with AP group, VAS was significantly higher in LP group at the 1st hour. Mean total tramadol consumptions were significantly different between the groups (AP-LP, p = 0.039; AP-TBS, p < 0.001; LP-TBS, p < 0.001). It was highest in the TBS group and lowest in the AP group. In the LP group, three patients (16.7 %) needed rescue analgesia in comparison with 11 (73.3 %) in the TBS group. None of the patients in the AP group needed rescue analgesic. AP is the least painful and TBS is the most painful procedure. PCA-bolus tramadol effectively treats pain caused by AP and LP; however, alleviation of pain caused by TBS usually needs rescue opioid analgesic.
手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的一个被批评的方面是术后疼痛。我们进行了一项研究,比较了不同手术技术后发生的疼痛严重程度,并确定了术后 24 小时内的镇痛需求。48 例原发性打鼾或 OSA 患者接受了前腭裂(AP)、侧咽成形术(LP)或舌基悬吊缝合术(TBS)。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)来测量疼痛强度。使用曲马多自控镇痛(PCA)装置和必要时的哌替啶解救来缓解疼痛。比较了 AP、LP 和 TBS 组的 VAS 疼痛评分、总 PCA-曲马多消耗量和解救镇痛需求。除了 12 小时和 LP 组 10 小时外,TBS 组的疼痛评分在所有研究时间点均高于 AP 组。与 AP 组相比,LP 组在第 1 小时的 VAS 明显更高。各组之间的平均总曲马多消耗量差异有统计学意义(AP-LP,p=0.039;AP-TBS,p<0.001;LP-TBS,p<0.001)。TBS 组最高,AP 组最低。LP 组中有 3 名患者(16.7%)需要解救镇痛,而 TBS 组中有 11 名患者(73.3%)需要解救镇痛。AP 组无患者需要解救镇痛。AP 是最不痛的,TBS 是最痛的。PCA-推注曲马多可有效治疗 AP 和 LP 引起的疼痛;然而,TBS 引起的疼痛缓解通常需要解救阿片类镇痛药。