National Anaerobic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany.
J Med Microbiol. 2012 Oct;61(Pt 10):1393-1400. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.043927-0. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
Between 2010 and 2011, 283 clinically relevant non-duplicate anaerobic isolates were analysed by MALDI-TOF MS and the results were compared with conventional identification. Immediately after isolation, an ethanol precipitation was carried out on isolated colonies and the stabilized samples were anonymized and sent to the laboratory of Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany, where the identification was done using the standard protocol for micro-organism identification on a Microflex LT mass spectrometer equipped with the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 software. Of 283 isolates, 218 (77 %) were identified at species level [log(score) ≥2.0], 31 isolates (10.95 %) were identified at genus level [log(score) 1.7-2.0] and 34 (12 %) gave non-reliable identification [log(score) <1.7]. Out of the 31 isolates with log(score) 1.7-2.0, in the case of 24 isolates the species name given by the MALDI Biotyper was accepted if it was the same as for the classical identification. Of 218 isolates identified at species level, 40 results were discordant with phenotypic identification, and of the 31 isolates identified at genus level according to the manufacturer's score cut-off, four gave results discordant with the phenotypic method. For the 44 discordant results, 16S rRNA gene sequencing confirmed MALDI-TOF MS identification in 41 cases, leaving three isolates (0.7 %) that had been misidentified by MALDI-TOF MS.
2010 年至 2011 年间,我们对 283 株具有临床相关性的非重复厌氧菌分离株进行了 MALDI-TOF MS 分析,并将结果与传统鉴定方法进行了比较。在分离后立即对分离株的菌落进行乙醇沉淀,然后将稳定的样本匿名并送到德国不来梅的布鲁克·道尔顿尼克(Bruker Daltonik)实验室,在配备 MALDI Biotyper 3.0 软件的 Microflex LT 质谱仪上使用微生物鉴定标准方案进行鉴定。在 283 株分离株中,有 218 株(77%)在种水平上得到了鉴定[log(score)≥2.0],31 株(10.95%)在属水平上得到了鉴定[log(score)1.7-2.0],34 株(12%)的鉴定结果不可靠[log(score)<1.7]。在 log(score)1.7-2.0 的 31 株分离株中,如果 MALDI Biotyper 给出的种名与经典鉴定方法相同,则有 24 株的种名被接受。在 218 株在种水平上得到鉴定的分离株中,有 40 株的结果与表型鉴定不一致,而根据制造商的评分截断值在属水平上鉴定的 31 株分离株中,有 4 株的结果与表型方法不一致。对于 44 个不一致的结果,16S rRNA 基因测序在 41 个病例中证实了 MALDI-TOF MS 的鉴定,而留下了 3 株(0.7%)被 MALDI-TOF MS 错误鉴定的分离株。