Smith Cathy
Department of History, Park Campus, University of Northampton, Boughton Green Road, Northampton NN27HS, UK.
Hist Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;23(89 Pt 1):104-16. doi: 10.1177/0957154X11429729.
This article argues that death from insanity raised serious questions for the medical profession and for those who promoted the public asylum movement in the nineteenth century. While the medical emphasis on the somatic origins of insanity was increasingly accepted, limited observable signs of disease in the brain at post-mortem made it difficult to explain cause of death. This posed problems for a growing county asylum movement which was justified on the basis that insanity was a treatable disease and thus mortality rates would naturally decline. As asylum populations continued to grow and mortality rates remained little changed, statistics on lunacy ultimately became not the predicted measure of success but instead clear evidence of failure.
本文认为,因精神错乱导致的死亡给医学界以及19世纪推动公立精神病院运动的人士提出了严峻问题。尽管医学界对精神错乱的躯体病因的重视日益得到认可,但死后在大脑中观察到的疾病迹象有限,使得难以解释死因。这给日益壮大的郡级精神病院运动带来了问题,该运动的正当理由是精神错乱是一种可治疗的疾病,因此死亡率自然会下降。随着精神病院收容人数持续增加,死亡率却几乎没有变化,疯人统计数据最终并未成为预期的成功衡量标准,反而成了失败的明显证据。