• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷枪与喷杆在观赏植物上的性能比较。

Comparison of the performance between a spray gun and a spray boom in ornamentals.

作者信息

Foqué D, Nuyttens D

机构信息

Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Agricultural Engineering. B.V. Gansberghelaan 115, bus 1, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

出版信息

Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2011;76(4):797-807.

PMID:22702197
Abstract

Flemish greenhouse growers predominantly use handheld spray guns and spray lances for their crop protection purposes although these techniques are known for their heavy workload and their high operator exposure risks. Moreover, when these techniques are compared with spray boom equipment, they are often found to be less effective. On the other hand, handheld spraying techniques are less expensive and more flexible to use. Additionally, many Flemish growers are convinced that a high spray volume and spray pressure is needed to assure a good plant protection. The aim of this work was to evaluate and compare the spray deposition, penetration and uniformity between a manually pulled horizontal spray boom and a spray gun under controlled laboratory conditions. In total, six different spray application techniques were evaluated. In general, the total deposition results were comparable between the spray boom and the spray gun applications but the boom applications resulted in a more uniform spray distribution over the crop. On a plant level, the spray distribution was not uniform for the different techniques with highest deposits on the upper side of the top leaves. Using spray guns at a higher spray pressure did not improve spray penetration and deposition on the bottom side of the leaves. From the different nozzle types, the XR 80 03 gave the best results. Plant density clearly affected crop penetration and deposition on the bottom side of the leaves.

摘要

弗拉芒地区的温室种植者主要使用手持喷枪和喷枪杆进行作物保护,尽管这些技术因工作量大以及操作人员暴露风险高而闻名。此外,与喷雾臂设备相比,这些技术往往效果较差。另一方面,手持喷雾技术成本较低且使用更灵活。此外,许多弗拉芒种植者坚信需要高喷液量和喷雾压力才能确保良好的植物保护效果。这项工作的目的是在受控的实验室条件下评估和比较手动拉动的水平喷雾臂和喷枪之间的喷雾沉积、穿透性和均匀性。总共评估了六种不同的喷雾应用技术。总体而言,喷雾臂和喷枪应用的总沉积结果相当,但喷雾臂应用在作物上的喷雾分布更均匀。在植株层面,不同技术的喷雾分布不均匀,顶部叶片上侧的沉积物最多。在较高喷雾压力下使用喷枪并不能提高叶片下侧的喷雾穿透性和沉积量。从不同的喷嘴类型来看,XR 80 03效果最佳。种植密度明显影响作物穿透性和叶片下侧的沉积量。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the performance between a spray gun and a spray boom in ornamentals.喷枪与喷杆在观赏植物上的性能比较。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2011;76(4):797-807.
2
Effects of nozzle type and spray angle on spray deposition in ivy pot plants.喷嘴类型和喷雾角度对常春藤盆栽植物喷雾沉积的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Feb;67(2):199-208. doi: 10.1002/ps.2051.
3
Optimization of the spray application technology in bay laurel (Laurus nobilis).月桂(月桂树)喷雾施用技术的优化。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):85-90.
4
Effect of spray angle and spray volume on deposition of a medium droplet spray with air support in ivy pot plants.空气辅助下中液滴喷雾的喷射角度和喷射量对常春藤盆栽植物沉积的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Mar;70(3):427-39. doi: 10.1002/ps.3584. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
5
Effect of spray application technique on spray deposition in greenhouse strawberries and tomatoes.喷雾施药技术对温室草莓和番茄雾滴沉积的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Feb;66(2):203-12. doi: 10.1002/ps.1858.
6
Optimisation of sequence and orientation for used nozzles based on few, full boom distribution measurements.基于少量全幅喷杆分布测量结果对所用喷头的顺序和方向进行优化。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2005;70(4):989-95.
7
Optimisation of a vertical spray boom for greenhouse spraying applications.用于温室喷雾作业的垂直喷杆的优化
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2003;68(4 Pt B):905-12.
8
Potential dermal pesticide exposure affected by greenhouse spray application technique.温室喷雾施用技术对皮肤潜在农药暴露的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Jul;65(7):781-90. doi: 10.1002/ps.1755.
9
Comparison of operator exposure for five different greenhouse spraying applications.五种不同温室喷雾应用中操作人员接触情况的比较。
J Agric Saf Health. 2004 Aug;10(3):187-95. doi: 10.13031/2013.16475.
10
Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.夹带空气和初始液滴速度对高斯喷雾漂移模型释放高度参数的影响。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(2 Pt A):197-200.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and assessment of a novel single-drive variable angle spraying machine.新型单驱动可变角度喷雾机的研制与评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31264. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82680-5.