Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1193-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02380.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
Mitral isthmus ablation is challenging. The use of steerable sheath and high ablation power may improve success rate.
This single-center, prospective study enrolled 200 patients who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), including mitral isthmus ablation. Mitral isthmus ablation was performed using an irrigated ablation catheter via a steerable sheath (endocardium: maximum power: 40/50 W limited to annular end, maximum temperature: 48 °C; coronary sinus [CS]: maximum power: 25/30 W, maximum temperature: 48 °C). Endpoint was bidirectional mitral isthmus block.
Mitral isthmus block was acutely achieved in 182/200 patients (91%). Sixty-nine percent of patients required CS ablation. Mean total ablation time was 13 ± 6 minutes. There was 1 case of acute circumflex artery occlusion. Mean left atrium (LA) diameter was significantly bigger in patients with unsuccessful mitral isthmus ablation (49 ± 4 mm vs. 43 ± 6 mm; P = 0.0007). In redo procedures, the incidence of reconduction at the mitral isthmus, roof and cavotricuspid isthmus was 44%, 37%, and 29%, respectively. Overall incidence of perimitral flutter was 9%. Prior complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation was a predictor for microreentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) whereas gaps in linear lesions predicted macroreentrant flutters. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, 73% of patients remained free from AF or AT.
We reported on a series of mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power (50 W). Larger LA diameter was a predictor of failure to achieve mitral isthmus block. The mitral isthmus had a moderately high incidence of re-conduction but was only associated with a relatively low incidence of perimitral flutter.
峡部消融具有挑战性。使用可操控鞘管和高消融功率可能会提高成功率。
这项单中心前瞻性研究纳入了 200 名接受房颤消融(包括峡部消融)的患者。通过可操控鞘管内的灌流消融导管进行峡部消融(心内膜:最大功率为 40/50 W,限制在瓣环端,最大温度为 48°C;冠状窦[CS]:最大功率为 25/30 W,最大温度为 48°C)。终点为双向峡部阻滞。
200 名患者中有 182 名(91%)在急性期实现了峡部阻滞。69%的患者需要进行 CS 消融。平均总消融时间为 13±6 分钟。有 1 例急性回旋支动脉闭塞。在峡部消融不成功的患者中,左心房(LA)直径明显较大(49±4mm 与 43±6mm;P=0.0007)。在再次手术中,峡部、房顶和三尖瓣峡部的再传导发生率分别为 44%、37%和 29%。整体二尖瓣环周房扑发生率为 9%。先前的复杂碎裂心房电图消融是微折返性房性心动过速(AT)的预测因素,而线性病变中的间隙则预测了大折返性房扑。平均随访 20±9 个月后,73%的患者无房颤或 AT。
我们报告了一系列使用可操控鞘管和高消融功率(50 W)进行的峡部消融。较大的 LA 直径是未能实现峡部阻滞的预测因素。峡部再传导发生率较高,但仅与相对较低的二尖瓣环周房扑发生率相关。