Suppr超能文献

使用可操控鞘管和高消融功率进行二尖瓣峡部消融:单中心经验。

Mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power: a single center experience.

机构信息

Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1193-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02380.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mitral isthmus ablation is challenging. The use of steerable sheath and high ablation power may improve success rate.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective study enrolled 200 patients who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), including mitral isthmus ablation. Mitral isthmus ablation was performed using an irrigated ablation catheter via a steerable sheath (endocardium: maximum power: 40/50 W limited to annular end, maximum temperature: 48 °C; coronary sinus [CS]: maximum power: 25/30 W, maximum temperature: 48 °C). Endpoint was bidirectional mitral isthmus block.

RESULTS

Mitral isthmus block was acutely achieved in 182/200 patients (91%). Sixty-nine percent of patients required CS ablation. Mean total ablation time was 13 ± 6 minutes. There was 1 case of acute circumflex artery occlusion. Mean left atrium (LA) diameter was significantly bigger in patients with unsuccessful mitral isthmus ablation (49 ± 4 mm vs. 43 ± 6 mm; P = 0.0007). In redo procedures, the incidence of reconduction at the mitral isthmus, roof and cavotricuspid isthmus was 44%, 37%, and 29%, respectively. Overall incidence of perimitral flutter was 9%. Prior complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation was a predictor for microreentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) whereas gaps in linear lesions predicted macroreentrant flutters. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, 73% of patients remained free from AF or AT.

CONCLUSION

We reported on a series of mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power (50 W). Larger LA diameter was a predictor of failure to achieve mitral isthmus block. The mitral isthmus had a moderately high incidence of re-conduction but was only associated with a relatively low incidence of perimitral flutter.

摘要

背景

峡部消融具有挑战性。使用可操控鞘管和高消融功率可能会提高成功率。

方法

这项单中心前瞻性研究纳入了 200 名接受房颤消融(包括峡部消融)的患者。通过可操控鞘管内的灌流消融导管进行峡部消融(心内膜:最大功率为 40/50 W,限制在瓣环端,最大温度为 48°C;冠状窦[CS]:最大功率为 25/30 W,最大温度为 48°C)。终点为双向峡部阻滞。

结果

200 名患者中有 182 名(91%)在急性期实现了峡部阻滞。69%的患者需要进行 CS 消融。平均总消融时间为 13±6 分钟。有 1 例急性回旋支动脉闭塞。在峡部消融不成功的患者中,左心房(LA)直径明显较大(49±4mm 与 43±6mm;P=0.0007)。在再次手术中,峡部、房顶和三尖瓣峡部的再传导发生率分别为 44%、37%和 29%。整体二尖瓣环周房扑发生率为 9%。先前的复杂碎裂心房电图消融是微折返性房性心动过速(AT)的预测因素,而线性病变中的间隙则预测了大折返性房扑。平均随访 20±9 个月后,73%的患者无房颤或 AT。

结论

我们报告了一系列使用可操控鞘管和高消融功率(50 W)进行的峡部消融。较大的 LA 直径是未能实现峡部阻滞的预测因素。峡部再传导发生率较高,但仅与相对较低的二尖瓣环周房扑发生率相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验