• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国全科医学作为一门学术学科的发展——2000 年至 2010 年研究成果分析。

The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010.

机构信息

Antonius Schneider Institute of General Practice, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jun 15;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-58.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-13-58
PMID:22702476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3489844/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010.

METHODS

Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute.

RESULTS

794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last.

CONCLUSIONS

The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed.

摘要

背景

政府资金支持被视为一般实践研究发展的前提。从 2002 年到 2012 年 2 月,德国引入了几个金额为 1320 万欧元的资助计划。我们旨在提供 2000 年至 2010 年期间德国学术家庭医学发表的原始数据和系统评价出版物的概述。

方法

通过搜索 Scopus 数据库并筛选家庭医学系或研究所的出版物清单,确定出版物。论文必须报告原始的主要研究或系统评价;至少有一位作者必须隶属于德国学术家庭医学系或研究所。

结果

共纳入 794 篇文章。出版物数量稳步增加,从 2000 年至 2003 年的 107 篇增加到 2004 年至 2007 年的 273 篇,最后到 2008 年至 2010 年的 414 篇。在第一阶段,不到 25%的文章用英语发表。从 2008 年到 2010 年,这一比例增加到 60.6%。没有影响因子的期刊发表的文章比例从 59.8%下降到 31.9%。尽管如此,即使在最近的时期,只有 31.6%的文章发表在影响因子超过 2 的期刊上。中位数影响因子从第一阶段的 0 增加到最后阶段的 1.2。

结论

德国学术研究部门和研究所发表的原始研究出版物的产出在过去十年中大大增加。然而,德国初级保健研究的专业性仍有待发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/fb2c795af583/1471-2296-13-58-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/200d4d51e65e/1471-2296-13-58-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/617cfded96d5/1471-2296-13-58-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/fb2c795af583/1471-2296-13-58-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/200d4d51e65e/1471-2296-13-58-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/617cfded96d5/1471-2296-13-58-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/3489844/fb2c795af583/1471-2296-13-58-3.jpg

相似文献

1
The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010.德国全科医学作为一门学术学科的发展——2000 年至 2010 年研究成果分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jun 15;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-58.
2
Quantity, topics, methods and findings of randomised controlled trials published by German university departments of general practice - systematic review.德国大学全科医学系发表的随机对照试验的数量、主题、方法和结果——系统评价
Trials. 2016 Apr 23;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1328-y.
3
Family medicine publications in Taiwan: an analysis of the Web of Science database from 1993 to 2012.台湾家庭医学出版物:1993年至2012年科学网数据库分析
J Chin Med Assoc. 2014 Nov;77(11):583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis.高影响力医学期刊发表的随机试验相关文章的全球绘制:一项横断面分析。
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9.
7
The Journal of Family Practice 1974-1988. Window to an evolving academic discipline.《家庭医疗杂志》1974 - 1988年。一扇通往不断发展的学术学科的窗口。
J Fam Pract. 1989 Mar;28(3):301-4.
8
[Independence in Plastic Surgery - Benefit or Barrier? Analysis of the Publication Performance in Academic Plastic Surgery Depending on Varying Organisational Structures].[整形外科的独立性——益处还是障碍?基于不同组织结构对学术整形外科发表表现的分析]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2015 Aug;47(4):213-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555954. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
9
10
Publication activities of German junior researchers in academic medicine: which factors impact impact factors?德国青年研究人员在学术医学领域的发表活动:哪些因素影响影响因子?
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 25;16:190. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0712-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring general practice research in Germany: a systematic review of dissertation topics from 1965-2023.探讨德国的全科医学研究:1965-2023 年论文题目系统综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;42(3):393-398. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2329213. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Key informants perspectives on creating a high impact research department in family and community medicine: a qualitative project.关键知情人对创建家庭医学和社区医学高影响力研究部门的看法:一个定性项目。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Feb 6;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02288-6.
3
[SaxoForN-a transregional primary care research network in Dresden and Frankfurt am Main : Design of a practice-based research infrastructure].

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of research in primary care and family medicine: the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Subject Category 'Primary Health Care'.
Fam Pract. 2011 Jun;28(3):239-40. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr021.
2
The German health care system in international comparison: the primary care physicians' perspective.德国医疗体系的国际比较:基层医生的视角。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Apr;108(15):255-61. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0255. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
3
Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis.澳大利亚、加拿大、德国、荷兰、英国和美国的初级保健研究产出:文献计量分析。
[萨克森跨地区初级保健研究网络——德累斯顿和美因河畔法兰克福:基于实践的研究基础设施设计]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Sep;66(9):1042-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03722-3. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
4
Diversity of academic general medicine: A cross-sectional bibliometric study of original English-language research articles in general medicine and cardiology in Japan.学术全科医学的多样性:对日本普通医学和心脏病学的原始英文研究文章的横断面文献计量学研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 18;101(11). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029072.
5
Development of Primary Care Research in North America, Europe, and Australia From 1974 to 2017.北美、欧洲和澳大利亚初级保健研究的发展:1974 年至 2017 年。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):49-51. doi: 10.1370/afm.2328.
6
European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN).欧洲全科医学研究网络(EGPRN)。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):143-154. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1300653.
7
Quantity, topics, methods and findings of randomised controlled trials published by German university departments of general practice - systematic review.德国大学全科医学系发表的随机对照试验的数量、主题、方法和结果——系统评价
Trials. 2016 Apr 23;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1328-y.
8
[Differences and similarities of primary care in the German and Spanish health care systems].[德国和西班牙医疗体系中初级保健的异同]
Aten Primaria. 2016 Feb;48(2):131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
9
Master's and doctoral theses in family medicine and their publication output, Suez Canal University, Egypt.埃及苏伊士运河大学家庭医学专业的硕士和博士论文及其发表成果
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):162-7. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154622.
10
Research publications in medical journals (1992-2013) by family medicine authors - suez canal university-egypt.埃及苏伊士运河大学家庭医学作者在医学期刊上发表的研究成果(1992 - 2013年)
J Family Med Prim Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;3(4):368-73. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.148112.
BMJ. 2011 Mar 8;342:d1028. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1028.
4
[From clinical practice guidelines towards quality assurance].从临床实践指南到质量保证
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Feb;54(2):160-5. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1207-8.
5
Themes and methods of research presented at European General Practice Research Network conferences.欧洲普通医疗研究网络会议提出的主题和研究方法。
Fam Pract. 2010 Aug;27(4):459-67. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq023. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
6
Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor--is it a force for good or harm?评论:持续影响因子的影响力——它是一股有益还是有害的力量?
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1129-30. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl191. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
7
Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity.改善全球医疗保健:对家庭医学研究必要性的批判性审视及增强研究能力的建议
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May 26;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5-16. doi: 10.1370/afm.194.
8
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.为何不应使用期刊影响因子来评估研究。
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498-502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497.
9
Is primary care essential?初级保健至关重要吗?
Lancet. 1994 Oct 22;344(8930):1129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90634-3.