Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.027. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
To assess the criterion validity and reproducibility of a new pedometer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Cross-sectional study.
Outpatient physiotherapy clinic from a university hospital.
Patients with COPD (N=30; 17 men; forced expiratory volume in the first second, 44±17% predicted) were videotaped while performing 2 protocols: one including 2 slow and 2 fast 5-minute walks, and another including a circuit of activities of daily living (ADLs). Concomitantly, patients wore 2 motion sensors: the new pedometer and a multisensor accelerometer.
None.
Step counting (SC), energy expenditure (EE), walking distance (WD), activity time (AT), and walking intensity (WI) registered by the pedometer were compared with video and the multisensor as criterion methods.
Correlations between the pedometer and the criterion method were high for SC during slow and fast walking (r=.79 and r=.95) and for EE during fast walking (r=.83). Correlation was more modest for EE during slow walking (r=.65) and for WD and WI during both speeds (.47<r<.68). The agreement between methods was also good, according to Bland-Altman plots. The device was reproducible for registering SC, WD, and EE during slow walking and for all variables during fast walking (intraclass correlation coefficient >.79 for all). During the ADLs circuit, the pedometer underestimated AT by an average of 55% but provided an acceptable EE estimation in a group basis (average difference of 6% with the multisensor).
In patients with COPD, the new pedometer analyzed in the present study is reproducible for most outcomes and highly valid for SC during slow and fast walking and EE during fast walking. The device's validity is more limited for EE during slow walking, and WD and WI at both speeds. Furthermore, during the performance of ADLs, it significantly underestimates activity time but provides an acceptable estimation of EE in a group basis.
评估一种新计步器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的效标效度和可重复性。
横断面研究。
大学医院门诊物理治疗诊所。
COPD 患者(N=30;17 名男性;第 1 秒用力呼气量,预计值的 44±17%)在进行 2 项方案时接受录像:一项方案包括 2 次缓慢和 2 次快速的 5 分钟步行,另一项方案包括日常生活活动(ADL)的活动循环。同时,患者佩戴 2 个运动传感器:新计步器和多传感器加速度计。
无。
计步器记录的步数(SC)、能量消耗(EE)、步行距离(WD)、活动时间(AT)和步行强度(WI)与视频和多传感器的标准方法进行比较。
在缓慢和快速步行时,计步器与标准方法的 SC 相关性很高(r=.79 和 r=.95),在快速步行时 EE 相关性较高(r=.83)。在缓慢步行时 EE 相关性稍低(r=.65),在两种速度下 WD 和 WI 的相关性也较低(.47<r<.68)。根据 Bland-Altman 图,方法之间的一致性也很好。该设备在缓慢步行时记录 SC、WD 和 EE,在快速步行时记录所有变量均具有可重复性(所有变量的组内相关系数>.79)。在 ADL 循环期间,计步器平均低估 AT 55%,但在组基础上可以提供可接受的 EE 估计(与多传感器的平均差异为 6%)。
在 COPD 患者中,本研究分析的新计步器在大多数结果中具有可重复性,在缓慢和快速步行时 SC 以及快速步行时 EE 具有高度有效性。在缓慢步行时 EE、WD 和 WI 方面,设备的有效性更有限。此外,在进行 ADL 时,它会大大低估活动时间,但在组基础上可以提供可接受的 EE 估计。