Suppr超能文献

五个医院的附加病理检验申请的数量、比率、来源和类型。

Volume, rates, source and types of add-on pathology test requests across five hospitals.

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Jan 26;50(6):1041-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0756.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Add-on test requests, where a clinician requests further test assays on an existing specimen, contribute disproportionately to pathology service workload. However, little research has quantified the volume, rates, source or types of add-on tests. This study provides a descriptive analysis of add-on testing within a pathology service serving five hospitals.

METHODS

We analyzed 6 months of test data extracted from a pathology service in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Add-on requests were analyzed in terms of total volume and as a proportion of all test requests and test assays; ten most frequently requested add-on test types for clinical chemistry and hematology; by patient registration category; and proportions of add-on requests received within 1-, 4-, 8-, and 24-h of specimen collection.

RESULTS

Add-on test requests constituted 3.7% (n=19,541) of the total 529,361 test requests. Clinical chemistry and hematology add-on requests accounted for 76.9% of all add-on requests. The add-on request rate was higher in the clinical chemistry (5.4%) than in hematology (1.3%). Patients who entered hospital via the emergency department had the highest rates of add-on requests. A total of 79.5% of add-on requests across the pathology service were made within 24-h of specimen collection.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume of add-on requests is substantial and varies considerably by test type and patient registration category thus impacting differentially upon pathology service departments. While some add-on requests are unavoidable in clinical practice, others are precipitated by inadequate information at the point of care. Improving appropriate utilization of add-on testing will reduce their burden on pathology services.

摘要

背景

附加测试请求,即临床医生在现有样本上请求进一步测试分析,不成比例地增加了病理服务工作量。然而,很少有研究量化了附加测试的数量、比率、来源或类型。本研究对服务于五家医院的病理服务中的附加测试进行了描述性分析。

方法

我们分析了从澳大利亚悉尼大都市的一个病理服务中提取的 6 个月的测试数据。附加请求根据总量以及占所有测试请求和测试分析的比例进行分析;列出临床化学和血液学中最常请求的十种附加测试类型;按患者注册类别进行分析;并分析在标本采集后 1、4、8 和 24 小时内收到的附加请求比例。

结果

附加测试请求占总 529361 个测试请求的 3.7%(n=19541)。临床化学和血液学的附加请求占所有附加请求的 76.9%。临床化学(5.4%)的附加请求率高于血液学(1.3%)。通过急诊进入医院的患者的附加请求率最高。整个病理服务中,共有 79.5%的附加请求是在标本采集后 24 小时内提出的。

结论

附加请求的数量相当可观,且根据测试类型和患者注册类别而有很大差异,因此对病理服务部门产生不同的影响。虽然在临床实践中某些附加请求是不可避免的,但其他请求则是由于在护理点提供的信息不足而引起的。改善附加测试的合理利用将减轻其对病理服务的负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验