• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1993-2007 年,26 个州的女性宫颈癌死亡率中社会经济差异不断扩大。

Widening socioeconomic disparities in cervical cancer mortality among women in 26 states, 1993-2007.

机构信息

Surveillance Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5110-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27606. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.27606
PMID:22707306
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial declines in cervical cancer mortality because of widespread screening, socioeconomic status (SES) disparities persist. The authors examined trends in cervical cancer mortality rates and the risk of late-stage diagnoses by SES.

METHODS

Using data from the National Vital Statistics System, trends in age-standardized mortality rates among women ages 25 to 64 years (1993-2007) by education level (≤12 years, 13-15 years, and ≥16 years) and race/ethnicity for non-Hispanic white (NHW) women and non-Hispanic black (NHB) women in 26 states were assessed using log-linear regression. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess disparities between those with ≤12 years versus ≥16 years of education during 1993 to 1995 and 2005 to 2007. Avertable deaths were calculated by applying mortality rates from the most educated women to others in 48 states. Trends in the risk of late-stage diagnosis by race/ethnicity and insurance status were evaluated in the National Cancer Data Base.

RESULTS

Declines in mortality were steepest for those with the highest education levels (3.2% per year among NHW women and 6.8% per year among NHB women). Consequently, the education disparity widened between the periods 1993 to 1995 and 2005 to 2007 from 3.1 (95% CI, 2.4-3.9) to 4.4 (95% CI, 3.5-5.6) for NHW women and from 3.8 (95% CI, 2.0-7.0) to 5.6 (95% CI, 3.1-10.0) for NHB women. The risk of late-stage diagnosis increased for uninsured versus privately insured women over time. During 2007, 74% of cervical cancer deaths in the United States may have been averted by eliminating SES disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

SES disparities in cervical cancer mortality and the risk of late-stage diagnosis increased over time. Most deaths in 2007 may have been averted by eliminating SES disparities.

摘要

背景

尽管由于广泛的筛查,宫颈癌死亡率大幅下降,但社会经济地位(SES)的差异仍然存在。作者研究了 SES 与宫颈癌死亡率和晚期诊断风险的趋势。

方法

使用国家生命统计系统的数据,评估了 26 个州的非西班牙裔白人(NHW)和非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)女性年龄在 25 至 64 岁之间(1993-2007 年)的按教育水平(≤12 年,13-15 年和≥16 年)和种族/族裔划分的标准化死亡率趋势,使用对数线性回归。使用率比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来评估 1993 年至 1995 年和 2005 年至 2007 年期间接受≤12 年教育与接受≥16 年教育之间的差异。在 48 个州,通过将死亡率应用于最高学历的女性来计算可避免的死亡人数。在国家癌症数据库中评估了种族/族裔和保险状况对晚期诊断风险的趋势。

结果

接受最高教育水平的女性死亡率下降最快(NHW 女性每年下降 3.2%,NHB 女性每年下降 6.8%)。因此,1993 年至 1995 年至 2005 年至 2007 年期间,NHW 女性之间的教育差异从 3.1(95%CI,2.4-3.9)扩大到 4.4(95%CI,3.5-5.6),而 NHB 女性从 3.8(95%CI,2.0-7.0)扩大到 5.6(95%CI,3.1-10.0)。随着时间的推移,未参保女性与私人参保女性相比,晚期诊断的风险增加。2007 年,美国 74%的宫颈癌死亡病例可能通过消除 SES 差异而得到避免。

结论

SES 对宫颈癌死亡率和晚期诊断风险的差异随时间增加。通过消除 SES 差异,2007 年的大多数死亡可能会被避免。

相似文献

1
Widening socioeconomic disparities in cervical cancer mortality among women in 26 states, 1993-2007.1993-2007 年,26 个州的女性宫颈癌死亡率中社会经济差异不断扩大。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5110-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27606. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
2
Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987-2005).50岁及以上女性乳腺癌发病率、诊断时分期、筛查、死亡率和生存率方面的地区社会经济和种族差异趋势(1987 - 2005年)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan;18(1):121-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0679.
3
Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000.1975 - 2000年美国宫颈癌发病率、死亡率、分期及生存率方面持续存在的地区社会经济差异。
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20467.
4
The influence of sex, race/ethnicity, and educational attainment on human immunodeficiency virus death rates among adults, 1993-2007.1993 - 2007年性别、种族/族裔及教育程度对成年人中人类免疫缺陷病毒死亡率的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 12;172(20):1591-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4508.
5
Insurance status and survival disparities among nonelderly rectal cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base.国家癌症数据库中非老年直肠癌患者的保险状况与生存差异。
Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;116(17):4178-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25317.
6
Selected cancers with increasing mortality rates by educational attainment in 26 states in the United States, 1993-2007.1993-2007 年美国 26 个州中受教育程度与死亡率上升相关的部分癌症类型。
Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Mar;24(3):559-65. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9993-y. Epub 2012 May 22.
7
Disparities in stage at diagnosis among adults with testicular germ cell tumors in the National Cancer Data Base.国家癌症数据库中成年人睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤诊断时分期的差异。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):23.e15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.08.012. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.1993年和2005年美国40至64岁女性在乳房X光检查使用方面存在的种族、族裔、收入及健康保险状况差异。
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):692-700. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817893b1.
9
The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study.美国社会经济地位对癌症患者生存的影响:国家癌症登记项目照护模式研究的结果
Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;113(3):582-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23567.
10
Mortality from leading causes by education and race in the United States, 2001.2001年美国按教育程度和种族划分的主要死因死亡率
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
2
Cancer statistics for African American and Black people, 2025.2025年非裔美国人和黑人的癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Mar-Apr;75(2):111-140. doi: 10.3322/caac.21874. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
fRAP 2.0: a community engagement method applied to cervical cancer disparities among Hispanic women.
fRAP 2.0:一种应用于西班牙裔女性宫颈癌差异的社区参与方法。
Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Aug 25;12(Suppl 2):e002601. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002601.
4
Understanding racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer.了解宫颈癌医疗保健支出中的种族差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Aug;30(8):873-881. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8.873.
5
Cervical Cancer Screening Among Female Medicaid Beneficiaries With and Without Schizophrenia.女性医疗补助受益人与非精神分裂症女性医疗补助受益人的宫颈癌筛查。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Nov 8;50(6):1499-1507. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae096.
6
Critical analyses of Latina mortality: disentangling the heterogeneity of ethnic origin, place, nativity, race, and socioeconomic status.对拉丁裔死亡率的批判性分析:厘清族裔出身、居住地、出生地、种族和社会经济地位的异质性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17721-9.
7
Women's Health Maintenance Efforts at a Student-Run Free Clinic in South Florida Exceeded National Trends During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,南佛罗里达州一家学生运营的免费诊所的女性健康维护工作超过了全国趋势。
J Community Health. 2023 Jun;48(3):501-507. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01190-z. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
8
Patient perspectives on cervical cancer screening interventions among underscreened women.未充分筛查女性人群中宫颈癌筛查干预措施的患者观点。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277791. eCollection 2022.
9
Income-based disparities in the risk of distant-stage cervical cancer and 5-year mortality after the introduction of a National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.韩国国家癌症筛查计划实施后,基于收入的宫颈癌远处转移风险和 5 年死亡率的差异。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022066. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022066. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to cervical cancer screening for women living with behavioral health conditions: a focus group study.临床医生对行为健康状况女性进行宫颈癌筛查障碍的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 9;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09350-5.