Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;167(6):1206-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02076.x.
Here we present a novel series of CCR8 antagonists based on a naphthalene-sulfonamide structure. This structure differs from the predominant pharmacophore for most small-molecule CC-chemokine receptor antagonists, which in fact activate CCR8, suggesting that CCR8 inhibition requires alternative structural probes.
The compounds were tested as inverse agonists and as antagonists against CCL1-induced activity in Gα(i) signalling and chemotaxis. Furthermore, they were assessed by heterologous competition binding against two radiolabelled receptor ligands: the endogenous agonist CCL1 and the virus-encoded antagonist MC148.
All compounds were highly potent inverse agonists with EC(50) values from 1.7 to 23 nM. Their potencies as antagonists were more widely spread (EC(50) values from 5.9 to 1572 nM). Some compounds were balanced antagonists/inverse agonists whereas others were predominantly inverse agonists with >100-fold lower potency as antagonists. A correspondingly broad range of affinities, which followed the antagonist potencies, was disclosed by competition with [(125)I]-CCL1 (K(i) 3.4-842 nM), whereas the affinities measured against [(125)I]-MC148 were less widely spread (K(i) 0.37-27 nM), and matched the inverse agonist potencies.
Despite highly potent and direct effects as inverse agonists, competition-binding experiments against radiolabelled agonist and tests for antagonism revealed a probe-dependent allosteric effect of these compounds. Thus, minor chemical changes affected the ability to modify chemokine binding and action, and divided the compounds into two groups: predominantly inverse agonists and balanced antagonists/inverse agonists. These studies have important implications for the design of new inverse agonists with or without antagonist properties.
在此,我们呈现了一系列基于萘磺酰胺结构的新型 CCR8 拮抗剂。该结构与大多数小分子 CC-趋化因子受体拮抗剂的主要药效团不同,实际上会激活 CCR8,这表明 CCR8 抑制需要替代的结构探针。
测试了这些化合物作为反向激动剂和 CCL1 诱导的 Gα(i)信号转导和趋化性活性的拮抗剂。此外,通过与两种放射性标记受体配体的异源竞争结合来评估它们:内源性激动剂 CCL1 和病毒编码的拮抗剂 MC148。
所有化合物均为高活性的反向激动剂,EC50 值为 1.7 至 23 nM。它们作为拮抗剂的效力范围更广(EC50 值为 5.9 至 1572 nM)。一些化合物是平衡的拮抗剂/反向激动剂,而另一些则主要是反向激动剂,作为拮抗剂的效力低 100 倍以上。与 [(125)I]-CCL1(K(i) 3.4-842 nM)的竞争揭示了相应广泛的亲和力范围,这与拮抗剂效力相符,而 [(125)I]-MC148 的亲和力则较窄(K(i) 0.37-27 nM),与反向激动剂效力相匹配。
尽管作为反向激动剂具有高度有效和直接的作用,但与放射性标记激动剂的竞争结合实验和拮抗作用测试表明,这些化合物存在探针依赖性的变构效应。因此,微小的化学变化会影响改变趋化因子结合和作用的能力,并将化合物分为两组:主要为反向激动剂和平衡的拮抗剂/反向激动剂。这些研究对设计具有或不具有拮抗剂特性的新型反向激动剂具有重要意义。