Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Dec;37(6):620-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01366.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
Thrombolysis using intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is the only available evidence-based treatment for acute ischaemic stroke; however, its current utilization is very low. Therefore, the aim of this article is to review the literature regarding the use of intravenous tPA for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. The review will also compare utilization rates of thrombolysis in different centres across the world and identify key reasons for the underutilization of thrombolysis in stroke.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant original articles, review papers and other publications over the publication period 1995-2012.
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (1995, N = 624 patients) and ECASS III (2008, N = 821 patients) are two pivotal randomized controlled trials providing evidence for the use of intravenous tPA within 3 h or 3-4.5 h from stroke onset, respectively. Both trials have shown that tPA administration decreases disability at 90 days from stroke. Furthermore, a recent pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials (2010, N = 3670 patients) supports these results, highlighting that early stroke treatment is associated with better outcomes, especially when treatment is started within 90 min of stroke onset (but suggesting that the benefit could be afforded within a 4.5-h time window). Three major observational trials, STARS (2000, N = 389 patients), CASES (2005, N = 1135 patients) and SITS-MOST (2007, N = 6483 patients), have reported acceptable safety and efficacy in clinical practice. However, only a small proportion of acute ischaemic stroke patients receive tPA in clinical practice, because of the limited availability of tPA-utilizing sites and suboptimal use of tPA in sites where it is available.
tPA reduces disability in stroke patients. Moreover, acceptable safety has been demonstrated in routine clinical practice. However, tPA is significantly underutilized, and specific efforts are needed to encourage appropriate implementation of the stroke treatment guidelines to optimize the use of this important therapy.
静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)溶栓是目前唯一有循证医学证据的急性缺血性脑卒中治疗方法;然而,目前其使用率非常低。因此,本文旨在回顾有关 tPA 治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的文献。该综述还将比较世界各地不同中心的溶栓使用率,并确定溶栓在脑卒中应用不足的关键原因。
检索 1995 年至 2012 年期间 MEDLINE、EMBASE、国际药学文摘(IPA)和 Google Scholar 中有关原始文章、综述和其他出版物的相关内容。
国立神经疾病与卒中研究院(NINDS)(1995 年,N = 624 例患者)和 ECASS III (2008 年,N = 821 例患者)是两项具有重要意义的随机对照试验,分别为 3 小时内和 3-4.5 小时内应用 tPA 提供了证据。这两项试验均表明 tPA 治疗可降低脑卒中发病 90 天后的残疾程度。此外,最近一项对随机对照试验的汇总分析(2010 年,N = 3670 例患者)支持了这些结果,强调早期脑卒中治疗与更好的结果相关,尤其是在发病 90 分钟内开始治疗(但提示在 4.5 小时的时间窗内可能会有获益)。三项大型观察性试验,STARS(2000 年,N = 389 例患者)、CASES(2005 年,N = 1135 例患者)和 SITS-MOST(2007 年,N = 6483 例患者),报道了在临床实践中安全性和疗效尚可。然而,在临床实践中,只有一小部分急性缺血性脑卒中患者接受 tPA 治疗,因为可应用 tPA 的场所有限,而且在可用场所中 tPA 的应用并不理想。
tPA 可降低脑卒中患者的残疾程度。此外,在常规临床实践中已证明其安全性尚可。然而,tPA 的应用明显不足,需要采取具体措施鼓励适当实施脑卒中治疗指南,以优化这一重要治疗方法的应用。