Zelinsky Gregory J
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University.
Vis cogn. 2012 Jan 1;20(4-5):515-545. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.666577. Epub 2012 May 23.
Understanding how patterns are selected for both recognition and action, in the form of an eye movement, is essential to understanding the mechanisms of visual search. It is argued that selecting a pattern for fixation is time consuming-requiring the pruning of a population of possible saccade vectors to isolate the specific movement to the potential target. To support this position, two experiments are reported showing evidence for off-object fixations, where fixations land between objects rather than directly on objects, and central fixations, where initial saccades land near the center of scenes. Both behaviors were modeled successfully using TAM (Target Acquisition Model; Zelinsky, 2008). TAM interprets these behaviors as expressions of population averaging occurring at different times during saccade target selection. A large population early during search results in the averaging of the entire scene and a central fixation; a smaller population later during search results in averaging between groups of objects and off-object fixations.
理解如何以眼动的形式选择用于识别和行动的模式,对于理解视觉搜索机制至关重要。有人认为,选择一个用于注视的模式是耗时的——需要对大量可能的扫视向量进行筛选,以分离出指向潜在目标的特定运动。为支持这一观点,报告了两项实验,展示了非目标注视(即注视落在物体之间而非直接落在物体上)和中央注视(即初始扫视落在场景中心附近)的证据。使用TAM(目标获取模型;泽林斯基,2008年)成功地对这两种行为进行了建模。TAM将这些行为解释为在扫视目标选择的不同时间发生的总体平均的表现。搜索早期的大量总体导致整个场景的平均化和中央注视;搜索后期较小的总体导致物体组之间的平均化和非目标注视。