Suppr超能文献

在瑞典背景下,使用普瑞巴林附加于常规护理治疗难治性神经性疼痛患者的成本效用研究。

A cost-utility study of the use of pregabalin added to usual care in refractory neuropathic pain patients in a Swedish setting.

机构信息

Cardiff Research Consortium, Cardiff, Wales.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1097-109. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.704458. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients refractory to older therapies for neuropathic pain (NeP) have few remaining therapeutic options. This study evaluates the cost-utility of pregabalin in the treatment of patients with refractory neuropathic pain in Sweden, from a healthcare and a societal perspective.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The use of non-randomized (observational) data to determine the effectiveness of treatments for NeP. The use of non-Swedish data for some input parameters in the model.

METHODS

A previously constructed discrete event simulation model was adapted to compare pregabalin combined with usual care to usual care alone in a Swedish setting. Pain profiles were generated using clinical data from five non-randomized pregabalin studies in refractory NeP patients. Utility data were generated from a UK survey of patients with NeP. Cost data were generated from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (TLV's) product price database, a national NeP register, and a regional registry study. Indirect costs were estimated from published sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated uncertainty in the model's output.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for pregabalin plus usual care treatment compared to usual care was 51,616 SEK/€5364 and 123,993 SEK/€12,886 with and without indirect costs, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses confirmed the clinical input data as the main driver of the model; even considerable changes to all other input parameters had only a modest effect on the ICER. The ICER remained well below a conservative threshold of 347,495 SEK/€36,113/£30,000 in all scenarios modelled.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found pregabalin combined with usual care to be cost-effective compared to usual care in patients with refractory NeP from a Swedish Health Care perspective. Moreover, sensitivity analysis showed pregabalin's cost-effectiveness to be robust in all scenarios modelled.

摘要

目的

对于对旧疗法有抗药性的神经性疼痛(NeP)患者来说,他们的治疗选择很少。本研究从医疗保健和社会角度评估普瑞巴林在治疗瑞典难治性神经性疼痛患者中的成本效益。

研究局限性

使用非随机(观察性)数据来确定 NeP 治疗方法的有效性。模型中某些输入参数使用非瑞典数据。

方法

对先前构建的离散事件模拟模型进行了调整,以比较普瑞巴林联合常规护理与单独常规护理在瑞典环境下的效果。使用来自五项难治性 NeP 患者普瑞巴林研究的临床数据生成疼痛概况。效用数据来自英国 NeP 患者调查。成本数据来自瑞典牙科和药品福利委员会(TLV)产品价格数据库、国家 NeP 登记处和区域登记研究。间接成本是根据已发表的资料估算的。单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析评估了模型输出的不确定性。

结果

与常规护理相比,普瑞巴林联合常规护理的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为 51616 瑞典克朗/5364 欧元和 123993 瑞典克朗/12886 欧元,包括和不包括间接成本。单因素敏感性分析证实临床输入数据是模型的主要驱动因素;即使对所有其他输入参数进行了相当大的更改,对 ICER 的影响也只是适度的。在所有模型情景中,ICER 均远低于保守阈值 347495 瑞典克朗/36113 欧元/30000 英镑。

结论

本研究发现,从瑞典医疗保健的角度来看,与常规护理相比,普瑞巴林联合常规护理在难治性 NeP 患者中具有成本效益。此外,敏感性分析表明,在所有模型情景中,普瑞巴林的成本效益都是稳健的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验